So
1974, not so hot a year. ’73 was a step
down from ’72, but still had a lot of bright spots. By ’74, there are still some quite good
albums, and some interesting things happening on the margins, but the overall
sense I get is that it’s a year where a lot of things stagnated or started to
decline. If after listening to ’73, I
was thinking the punks were overstating how bad the previous years were, now I
start to see what they were talking about a little. In part, this is because things are
stagnating, but it’s also in part because a lot of the big names (Zeppelin,
Floyd, Sabbath, Gaye, among others) sit this year out.
Of
course, a couple of stray songs in my collection remind me that my listening
project, reflecting my own musical collection, is far from representative of
what the average listener was going through.
Thanks to hindsight, I have a much easier time locating the bright spots
that others missed, and I’m skipping over a lot of mainstream dross that I have
no need or desire to obtain. This I’m
reminded of as “Hooked on a Feeling” and (especially) “Please Come to Boston for
the Weekend” show up in my shuffling, songs I obtained either on soundtracks or
ironically, and are really, really bad.
So glad for once that this project includes some big blind spots.
Of
course, as I alluded to above, the bright spots are getting fewer and farther
between in ’74. This is maybe most
obvious in glam, which is dying as a scene this year. Mott The Hoople put out their last album, and
a couple of solid singles aside, it’s a considerable step down from their last
two, leaning much more heavily on a retro-‘50s sound that just not as
compelling as their more Stones-y earlier work.
Eno is still doing interesting stuff, but it’s increasingly abstracted
from glam. In a sense it reminds me of
Zappa, insofar as it’s drifting off into its own idiosyncratic world, removed
from the rest of what’s going on. This,
incidentally, is one of the reasons I haven’t talked much about Zappa, as he
often doesn’t relate much to what else is going on. Roxy kinda sound like Eno, but they’re
drifting toward a more mainstream dance sound.
Not bad, though.
Bowie is also getting artier, and
incorporating a stronger soul influence.
The latter is especially clear on his until-recently out-of-print live
album. I guess Bowie deserves credit for
a live album that doesn’t just sound like re-recordings of the studio cuts, but
I’m not sure slathering the kind of smooth-jazz saxophone you hear on a grocery
store PA over Ziggy Stardust tracks is a real step forward (and as I look at
the liners, I discover that said sax is in fact played by yacht-rock maestro
David Sanborn – so smooth, so bland). Interestingly,
the only song that benefits from this treatment is the oldest; “The Width of A
Circle” from way back on Man Who Sold The
World. Curious that this got a
release, while nothing from the Ziggy tour was released until years later. Bowie’s
studio album this year is tagged as incorporating soul influences, but
basically that just means it swings a bit more than his previous stuff. This, in turn, makes him sound considerably
more like the Rolling Stones, especially on “Rebel, Rebel,” a song some portion
of my readership (who shall remain nameless) thought was the Rolling Stones when first they heard it.
The Stones themselves, meanwhile,
are sounding more glam this year, although they lean closer to T. Rex than Bowie,
esp. on “It’s Only Rock & Roll (But I Like It)”. It’s
Only Rock & Roll (the album) isn’t quite a complete glam makeover, but
they’re definitely incorporating more of the glam sound, in a circular bit of
influence. It also makes it clear that
the Stones’ greatest weapon is their rhythm section, as that band could swing
so much more naturally than pretty much any other British band ever, and better
than most rock bands anyway. Even as
they enter their follower phase, the Stones still kick up a pretty good racket,
at least.
On the
margins of glam, Queen are pretty interesting, sounding at times quite close to
Mott, insofar as their rock is both harder than Bowie or T. Rex and cut with
older styles (music hall for Queen, 50s rock for Mott). ELO, who I’d previously also tagged as
glam-prog, no longer really fit that bill, although I’m liking them better and
better. At this point, though, their
orchestrated pop sound most recalls Wings, of any of their contemporaries. Wings, for what it’s worth, only put out a
single this year, but it’s one of their best (“Junior’s Farm”).
Unlike
glam, prog actually has a pretty good year this year. Tull put out a pretty good album, returning
to shorter-form songs with a distinct glam influence. They haven’t “gone glam” or anything, and
it’s not as glam sounding as the Stones, but I think of it as analogous to when
90s Brit bands like Blur & Oasis would incorporate electronica elements
into their sound: it shows they’re aware of their contemporaries, but it’s not
a wholesale reinvention. It works on
“Bungle In The Jungle,” at least. The War Child album as a whole, though, is
solid but unremarkable.
The
other big prog bands return to form by revamping their sound as well, or at
least Yes and King Crimson do. In both
cases, you might call their shift more “metallic,” although in Crimson’s case
it would mean “sounding more like Black Sabbath,” while for Yes it means
“sounds more like metal on metal,” thanks to new keyboardist Patrick Moraz’s
at-times harsh synth sound. I understand
why a lot of people hate on Relayer,
since it’s a much meaner-sounding record than anything else in the Yes
catalogue, but it’s probably my 3rd favorite of their albums (after The Yes Album and Close To The Edge, but above the highly-uneven Fragile). It also offers a
good idea of why Tales didn’t work:
every other Yes album to this point pushed their sound forward in some way, but
Tales was Yes treading water, and
that’s death to a band like this. Relayer, on the other hand, shows not
only a more aggressive sound, but also elements that recall Bitches Brew-era Miles Davis. It’s probably their hardest-rocking album,
and shows them once again shifting their sonic palette to great effect. King Crimson, meanwhile, put out probably my
favorite of their albums, although it’s one that for me coasts primarily on
guitar tone. Not that the songs aren’t
solid, but Fripp has seemingly developed his variation on the Tony Iommi’s
classic Master of Reality fuzz, and
like that album, Red is practically a
concept album about guitar tone. Small
wonder it was one of Kurt Cobain’s favorites.
Finally,
on the margins of prog, I just mentioned above that Zappa’s disconnect from the
broader musical world means I seldom have cause to mention him, but it does
sound to me like Apostrophe’ is a
parody of concept albums & rock operas, and a pretty solid one, insofar as
I’m fairly certain its long, rambling, incoherent story is deliberately
so. Of course, lyrics generally seem
like something of an afterthought to Zappa, so who knows?
Someone
for whom lyrics are emphatically not an afterthought, however, is Bob Dylan,
who releases his first proper studio album since 1970. You’d never guess there was a 4 year gap
between New Morning and Planet Waves, though, so close they are
in sound. Especially with the long gap,
it can’t help but feel a little underwhelming.
Disappointing too for the Band, for whom Planet Waves is the first non-covers album since 1971’s Cahoots.
I suspect, given that it was the first non-soundtrack/outtake album from
Dylan and non-covers album for the Band, that it was a touch overrated at the
time. Now, it’s probably my least
favorite Dylan album since Times They Are
A’Changing, not counting Dylan. Pleasant enough, though, and I do like songs
like “On A Night Like This” and “Forever Young,” but there’s nothing here as
good as last year’s “Knocking On Heaven’s Door.” Still, he’s already in ’74 laying down the
studio tracks for his real return to
form next year, the bootleg NYC sessions for which I’m listening to this
year.
Two
other major folk-rock singer-songwriters have very good years. Richard Thompson, whose solo debut was good
but slight, records what might be his greatest album. If you haven’t heard I Want To See The Bright Lights Tonight, and have any interest in
folk-rock or 70s roots-rock, please seek this one out. It’s a gem.
Great player, great songwriter, great singers. Remarkably, Thompson manages to find a singer
almost as good as Sandy Denny (his old Fairport singer) in new wife Linda
Thompson. Sonically, it’s quite close to
Fairport, although it leans less toward straight purity, and roughs it up a bit
with some electric energy. Neil Young
also does quite well this year, continuing his so-called “ditch trilogy” of
angry, grungy albums. On The Beach was the third recorded but
second released, and while I like Time
Fades Away just a hair more, that’s largely based on the ragged energy of
the live record. On The Beach probably has better songs overall, and certainly is a
little more clear-eyed lyrically, if still wholly disgusted with the whole increasingly
mellow LA folk-rock scene. Both Young
and Thompson manage to make much more compelling cases for the continued
vitality of the genre as a whole, though – stronger than Dylan, at any rate. Also, it’s fun to hear Neil Young’s answer
song (“Walk On”) to Lynyrd Skynyrd’s answer song (“Sweet Home Alabama”) to
Young’s own “Alabama” and “Southern Man.”
It’s like a hip-hop feud, only between a Canadian folkie and Southern
rednecks. Although I don’t think it’s a coincidence
that Skynyrd make sure to put an ode to an old black bluesman (“Curtis Loew”)
on the same album to underline the idea that they’re proud Southerners but not
racists. Overall, a step down from their
debut, though, sounding much more conventionally boogieing, and stepping back
from the big epics of last year.
Elsewhere
in the realm of hard rock, we’re missing a bunch of the big guns. Both Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath sit out
’74. The Who’s Odds ‘n Sods is just that, and as is the nature of these sort of
things, contains some great stuff (“Pure & Easy), some interesting
obscurities (“Postcard,” which recalls the whimsical side of Cream), & some
weird stuff (I love their anti-smoking PSA, rejected by the American Cancer
Society for being too dark). It also has
their most generic hit (“Long Live Rock”).
One thing I’m definitely struck by is that, while the Who were generally
excellent in quality in the ‘70s, they were well below-average in terms of
productivity. There are only 2 more
proper Who albums in the whole decade, a sharp contrast to most of their much
more prolific peers. Perhaps that’s why
they were one of the first active groups to put out one of these outtakes
comps.
Elsewhere in hard rock, Deep Purple
is in the process of grinding to a halt.
New singers David Coverdale and Glenn Hughes (to become vocalists for
Jimmy Page and Black Sabbath later on, respectively) rock credibly on
greatest-hits tracks like “Burn” and “Stormbringer,” but the Stormbringer album itself is pretty
rough going after the title track. For
some reason, Coverdale & Hughes try to turn Deep Purple into a roots-soul
outfit, sounding closer to Traffic than anything in Purple’s prog or metal
past. Traffic is starting to sink in my
estimation after this and last year’s Badger album, as I realize how much they,
like Led Zeppelin are a great band but a horrible influence. Blue Oyster Cult this year are out-Purpling
Deep Purple in the organ-driven hard rock sound, at least, and with better
lyrics to boot. Secret Treaties is certainly my favorite BOC album, although my
collection is smaller than it could be, sadly.
Remarkably, though, they’re not
even the best band out of Long Island this year: Mountain is back! I am a little surprised at just how excited I
am to get Mountain back, after only a couple of years since their last one, but
I just really love that fantastic fuzzy/heavy sound. And it hasn’t changed at all. The live album from this year is better than
the live half of Flowers of Evil, but
not a great change. And Avalanche, their studio album, is only different
insofar as it leans more on the heavier tracks than the mellower/folkier end of
things. Also, it’s got my 3rd
favorite “Satisfaction” cover (after Otis Redding and Devo). Admittedly, they basically just turn it into
a Mountain song, but as covered above, I love me that Mountain sound. So I’m pretty sad that this is the end of the
line for Mountain…
Not a
lot to report in the realm of soul. It’s
not degenerating like glam (not when songs as good as Al Green’s “Take Me To
the River” (I used to think the Talking Heads did this better: I was wrong, and
I apologize to Rev. Green) and albums as good as Stevie Wonder’s Fulfillingness’s First Finale come out),
but it is kinda treading water. Soul has
always been a more evolutionary than revolutionary genre, but this year there’s
not a lot of change from the last. The
same holds for reggae; some very good stuff (especially Marley’s Natty Dread), but largely just a
continuation of what was happening last year.
Funk, however, has a quite good
year, esp. as Parliament is finally a going concern. It’s too bad that glam is dying just as funk
is really taking off, as I think there’s an argument that they’re very similar
in a lot of ways. Not musically,
obviously, but in their emphasis on sci-fi/fantasy and freaky theatricality,
there’s an easy line between Bowie and George Clinton to be drawn. Incidentally, what I do notice musically is
just how much Clinton took his essential sound from Sly & The Family Stone,
who are very similar musically this year, if more paranoid and dark in tone
than Clinton.
James
Brown, meanwhile, is pursuing a kind of funk that’s fairly radically different
from what Clinton’s up to, with much tighter arrangements that at times recall
the big band jazz of an earlier era. I
begin to think that Soul On Top,
Brown’s deliberate experiment in that style from 1970, may be a crucial one in
explaining his development. Songs like “Coldblooded”
and “Papa Don’t Take No Mess” rock harder than the swing cats, but their horn
charts don’t sound too far removed.
Also, if Brown sounds removed from the main trends in funk in 1974, he
sounds like a stronger influence on the early-80s funk of Prince and Rick James
than P-Funk or the rest of what’s happening in funk this year. And Prince totally stole his yelp-y scream
thing from James Brown. Also, Brown’s
reliance on vamps over the more sprawling sound of P-Funk sounds more like an
influence on sample/loop based hip-hop (even if those loops would often be of
P-Funk tracks). Finally, I should note
that I mentioned last time that the Stones on “Heartbreaker” sounded closer to
Brown than a lot of what else was happening in funk. Well, this year, “The Big Payback,” for me
the apex of Brown’s funk years, reminds me of “Gimme Shelter,” if only in that
it maintains a similar groove of sustained menace. “Payback” is far more danceable, though, and
a groove that I don’t want to end.
I also
want to include a last note on Steely Dan.
I guess they sound most like AM soft rock of anything else that’s going
on, but they’re also showing a strong, strong jazz influence, covering Ellington
and quoting Horace Silver. Very clever,
very catchy music. So far, I like every
Steely Dan album better than the last, I just don’t know where to slot them in. Unlike Zappa, they don’t sound outside of
time, but their sound is so much their own that it’s hard to compare them to
much. Eno maybe, in approach, if not in
sound. Also, the more sophisticated
their music gets, the harder time I have juxtaposing the sounds on the record
with the dirty hippies on the record jacket…
Song of the
Year: Gram Parsons – “$1000
Wedding.” I almost gave this one to
James Brown’s “The Big Payback,” but “$1000 Wedding” is an instant standard,
and that sort of thing doesn’t come along every day. Plus, while it’s been covered many, many
times, I don’t think anyone did it better than Parsons.
Album of
the Year: Big Star – Radio City. Kind of a surprise for me, as it’s not a
record that screams greatness. If it had
come out 5 years earlier or later, when this style of pop-rock was more popular
, it probably would have been lost in the shuffle (although paradoxically would
have sold more copies). But it’s really
solid, with really good songs. It’s
nothing that the Byrds weren’t doing earlier (or R.E.M. would do later), but c.
1974, only Tom Petty was mining similar territory, and not half as well. Neil Young, Yes, and Richard & Linda
Thompson all deserve runner-up nominations, though.
Artist Most
Benefiting from Reevaluation: Mountain. I’ve covered above how unexpectedly excited I
was for their return this year, but at this point I’m willing to say that I
love Mountain more than their greatest influence Cream. Their hit-to-miss ratio was much higher, but
also a fatter sound and better singing, and a sound that is pretty close to my
Platonic ideal of hard rock. In no small
part, the Black Keys are one of my favorite active groups because of the debt
they owe Mountain.
Artist Most
Diminished in Reevaluation: Kraftwerk. It turns out that not only did Neu! do the
motorik sound earlier, but they did it better too, always sounding a little
less predictable than their ex-bandmates.
It does make me wonder what they would have produced had they all stayed
in one group.
Album List
ABBA - Gold
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Big Star - Radio City
Billy Cobham – Total Eclipse
Blue Öyster Cult – Secret Treaties
Bob Dylan - Blood On The Tracks (New York Sessions)
Bob Dylan - Greatest Hits Volume 3
Bob Dylan - Live 1961-2000: Thirty-Nine Years of Great
Concert Performances
Bob Dylan - Vol. 2 : Rare And Unreleased, 1963-1974
Bob Dylan - Vol. 3: Rare And Unreleased, 1974-1991
Bob Dylan & The Band – Planet Waves
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Legend
Bob Marley & The Wailers – Natty Dread
Brian Eno - Taking Tiger Mountain By Strategy
Bruce Springsteen - Misc.
Charles Wright & The Watts 103rd Street Rhythm Band -
Express Yourself: The Best Of Charles Wright
Chuck Brown - The Best Of Chuck Brown
Dave Brubeck - Ken Burns Jazz: Dave Brubeck
David Bowie – Aladdin Sane
David Bowie - Changesbowie
David Bowie – David Live
Deep Purple – Stormbringer
Deep Purple - The Very Best Of Deep Purple
Dennis Alcapone - Guns Don't Argue
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of
Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Frank Zappa - Apostrophe'
George Harrison - The Best Of George Harrison
Gram Parsons - Grievous Angel
James Brown - 20 All Time Greatest Hits!
James Brown - The Big Payback: 1971-1975
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
Jimmy Buffett - Songs You Know By Heart
Joni Mitchell - Hits
King Crimson - Red
Kraftwerk - Autobahn
Leonard Cohen - The Best Of
Lou Reed - Collections
Lynyrd Skynyrd - All-Time Greatest Hits
Marvin Gaye - Live
Merle Haggard - HAG: The Best Of Merle Haggard
Mott The Hoople - Greatest Hits
Mott The Hoople – Live
Mott The Hoople - The Hoople
Mountain – Avalanche
Mountain – Twin Peaks
Neil Young - Decade
Neil Young – On The Beach
Nick Drake - Way To Blue (An Introduction To Nick Drake)
Nick Lowe - Nutted By Reality
Parliament - Tear The Roof Off 1974-1980
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Queen - Classic Queen
Queen - Greatest Hits
Richard & Linda Thompson - I Want To See The Bright
Lights Tonight
Richard & Linda Thompson - Wedding Songs
Ringo Starr - Photograph: The Very Best Of Ringo Starr
Rod Stewart & The Faces - Gold
Roxy Music - The Best Of Roxy Music
Rush - Chronicles
Sly & The Family Stone - The Essential Sly & The
Family Stone
Steely Dan - A Decade of Steely Dan
Steely Dan – Pretzel Logic
Stevie Wonder - At The Close Of A Century
Stevie Wonder – Fulfillingness’s First Finale
The Kinks - Celluloid Heroes
The Rolling Stones - Forty Licks
The Rolling Stones – It’s Only Rock & Roll
The Staple Singers - City In The Sky
The Staple Singers - The Very Best Of The Staple Singers
The Who – Odds & Sods
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers - Playback V: Through The
Cracks
V/A - Back In The Day Jamz
V/A - Children Of Nuggets II
V/A - Kill Bill, Vol. 1
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Reservoir Dogs
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
V/A - Trojan Dub Massive Chapter I
Van Morrison – It’s Too Late To Stop Now
Yes - Relayer
No comments:
Post a Comment