Saturday, March 31, 2012

1976


                1976 is an odd one.  Things are definitely starting to pick up some in ’76, but mostly in the margins, with the debut of the Ramones and the explosion of dub.  The mainstream is continuing the stagnation that’s been going on since ’74.  Glam is dead, and prog, soul, and folk-rock are all fading.  There’s some decent hard rock going on, but it’s increasingly metallic, focused more on virtuosic flash and ornate and/or pummeling riffs.  More problematically, no matter how good it is, it’s not really anything we haven’t already been hearing since ’68.  Therefore, it’s hard to overstate how exciting the Ramones sound in ’76.  They’re building on pre-’67 rock traditions, but in a genuinely fresh, minimalist approach that’s so effortlessly exciting, catchy, and straight-up fun that it makes the more convoluted work of other rock artists sound overworked and fussy. 
                And the Ramones are pretty alone at this point.  By the end of the year, the Damned will be mining similar territory with their early singles, but otherwise that’s about it.  Blondie are fellow-travelers, but while they similarly return to a simpler, more pop-rock sound, they sound a lot more trad and less revolutionary than the Ramones.  Good stuff, but not revolutionary.  Comparable to what Big Star was doing a couple of years ago, I suppose.  Joe Strummer and his 101ers sound even more trad, even if they’re doing a pretty credible job of it, esp. on the lone single released while they were still together, “Keys To Your Heart.”  Who they actually sound a lot like is Tom Petty.  Like Petty, they’re mining very similar territory; specifically, the circa ’65 British Invasion.  Petty has better songs, but otherwise they are very close sonically.  But while I’ve always heard Petty as a fairly backward-looking figure, listened to among his contemporaries, he’s at least as forward looking as some of the acts that will be key parts of punk & new wave.
                Patti Smith will also be a key part of that scene, but I still hear her in ’76 not as a proto-punk, but fitting on an art-metal continuum from her to Blue Öyster Cult to Boston, which I grant sounds kind of odd.  But Smith is not so sonically removed from BÖC, and in fact even appears on their breakthrough album, Agents of Fortune.  In turn, it’s not especially far to go from the fantastic experiment in guitar tone that is “Don’t Fear The Reaper” to the similar sonic sheen of Boston’s debut.  In fact, if it weren’t for the Ramones making their brand of studio polish sound kinda fussy, Boston’s Boston would be probably the most exciting debut this year.  They get slagged as calculated sometimes, but these are some pretty great pop-rock tunes, and while I imagine they couldn’t quite pull it off live, the production sounds great on record.  If it sounds calculated, it’s not the calculation of, say, Toto, crafting tunes to maximize their chart appeal.  Rather, it’s the calculation of a studio rat who has a perfect sound in his head, and wants every note perfect.  If he’d been producing prog-rock tunes, instead of pop-rock tunes, he’d probably get a lot more respect.  In fact, when Boston stretches out a bit, they sound a lot like Rush.  See “Foreplay/Long Time,” and compare it to the overture section of “2112.”
                Front-line prog rock, meanwhile, sounds pretty weak this year; a genre that, like glam before it, sounds like it’s starting to fade.  Nothing from Yes this year.  An OK album from Genesis, who I don’t hate (as I hate ELP), but who I just can’t get excited about.  Tull, meanwhile, after a return to form last year, are starting to abandon prog entirely.  Too Old To Rock & Roll sounds more like the Kinks’ theatrical retro-rock of the last couple of years than prog.  And like the Kinks, while they turn out a good tune or two, the showtunes-rock fusion doesn’t really do it for me. 
                A good year, however, for what I suppose you might call “hard prog,” on the border of prog and metal.  A good year, but not a tremendously diverse one.  Everyone is pretty much converging on the sound that Sabbath had been working with on Sabotage.  They’d end up in much different places, but Rush, Rainbow, and Judas Priest sound very close this year, sonically, and heavily indebted to Sabbath.  In fact, although I’ll take first-four-album Sabbath over Priest any day, Priest probably do the tighter hard (instead of heavy) sound better than the always-a-little-sloppy Sabbath, a sloppiness that really works in their favor on the early records, but not so much with their later sound.  Rainbow, a Deep Purple spin-off featuring Sabbaths’ future vocalist, sound pretty much exactly halfway between those two bands.  Rush, meanwhile, make their most compelling case yet to be taken seriously as a prog-rock band, with the sidelong epic “2112.”  Not to be taken seriously lyrically, though, being indebted to the work of sociopath/hack sci-fi novelist Ayn Rand.  Also, undercutting whatever lyrical message there may be is that the “Temple of Syrinx” theme kicks sufficient ass to make living in a totalitarian future sound awesome.  Neil Peart will become one of the finest lyricists in prog in a couple of years, but “2112” should be taken about as seriously as “By-Tor & The Snow Dog.”
                Even Zeppelin are drifting toward that hard-prog/metal sound.  They’ve never sounded more like a conventional metal band than on tracks like “Achilles’ Last Stand.”  Elsewhere, though, they’re still doing their Zep-style take on funk-rock, and the overall effect is very close to the new tracks from last year’s Physical Graffiti.    Speaking of funk-rock, last year I said that I heard more Stones than Zeppelin in Aerosmith’s sound, but this year I take it back.  When Aerosmith try to play funk, like they do this year, they sound a lot more like Zeppelin.  I suppose it comes from, like Zeppelin, having a rhythm section better suited to pounding like Zeppelin than swinging like the Stones.
                The Stones, meanwhile, really seem like they’re showing off their rhythm section this year, where they try their hands quite successfully at funk and pretty miserably at reggae.  Black & Blue has been described by Keith as their guitarist-tryout album, and it shows.  This is a collection of grooves and jams, rather than songs.  The Stones certainly can swing, but their strength has never been jamming, but rather songcraft.  Still, they sound more energized but also slighter than on It’s Only Rock & Roll.  That one felt like product; this one feels unfinished, but like it’s the product of a band that’s engaged in making creative music.  So I guess the album it’s most like is the studio-jam trifle Jamming With Edward. 
                One of the guitarists the Stones considered, although not appearing on Black & Blue, was apparently Jeff Beck.  It’s interesting to listen to Beck’s Wired in that context, but not especially enlightening.  For what it’s worth, I think the hard-rocking Beck replacing Brian Jones in ’68 would have been fascinating, but trying to put fusion-jamming Beck in as Mick Taylor’s replacement in ’76 would have failed.  They just had developed too different sounds.  Although the Stones ultimately chose the safest option, basically calling up a player from their minor-league affiliate, the Faces.  Beck, meanwhile, continues his fusion work, but in a harder, less compelling fashion.  Honestly, it recalls more than anything Frank Zappa’s fusion stuff; well-played and slightly metallic, instead of the smoother fusion of Stevie Wonder.  Zappa, meanwhile, sounds almost shockingly like a conventional metal band on Zoot Allures.  “Conventional” is relative with Zappa, of course, but this stuff (esp. the instrumental stuff) sounds appropriate next to circa-76 metal.
                Sounding considerably less conventional, meanwhile, is David Bowie, who’s mashing together his soul experiments of the last couple of years with a more mechanical sound borrowing heavily from Neu! and Kraftwerk.  In a sense, this is Bowie’s big turn from glam/pop-star to art-rocker, although it also sounds like he’s finally following up his proggier inclinations from way back on The Man Who Sold The World, an album that I keep returning to in evaluating Bowie’s path.  Still, without this record and its Berlin follow-ups, I suspect Bowie would be remembered as an entertaining but slight figure, about on par with T. Rex.  Speaking of T. Rex, they’re another band that sound irrelevant post-Ramones.  Their last big single, “I Love To Boogie,” is perfectly credible glam, but just sounds slight compared to the Ramones’ full-bore assault.  Not sounding slight, & in fact remarkably ahead of their time are Devo, who like Bowie are mixing a mechanical German-influenced sound into their music.  The difference, I suppose, is that Bowie’s basic material is soul at this point, while Devo’s is garage rock.
                On the folk-rock end of things, it’s kind of a mixed bag, but also a genre that’s starting to sound like it’s winding down.  Dylan continues his comeback with Desire, which is probably as sonically innovative as he ever got.  His early folk sound was borrowed from Woody Guthrie, his ‘60s rock sound was garage-rock, and his sound since then had been very close to his roots-rock contemporaries.  Here, though, he’s got some manner of gypsy-folk sound that’s distinctly his own.  So that’s for the good.  For the bad, we’ve got an aborted CSNY reunion and the Crosby-Nash and Stills-Young albums that follow from it.  I don’t have a lot to say about Crosby & Nash, except that they’re sounding somewhat more like folk-rock than the soft-rock of last year.  Stills-Young, however, is pretty disappointing.  Apart from Young’s “Long May You Run,” this is some weak, forgettable stuff, with a mellow ocean-centric focus that recalls an uninspired Jimmy Buffett as much as anything.  Tropical, but in a Florida Keys way rather than anywhere further south.  Especially disappointing from Young, who last year released two excellent records, and this year puts out half an album of throwaways.  To my pleasant surprise, though, Still’s solo record this year is pretty solid.  It didn’t blow me away, but unlike last year’s, it’s a record I’ll pull out to listen to outside of the scope of this project.  He definitely rocks harder than on the oh-so-mellow Stills-Young record, if not as hard as solo Young can.  Stills, for what it’s worth, is starting to show a bit of hero worship for his old Buffalo Springfield partner, covering Young on last year’s record and this one (a credibly rockin’ “The Loner”).  Overall, a mellower and more layered sound than Young’s more primitive rocking.  At times it puts me in the mood of Steely Dan, who this year are also kind of a disappointment.  Sonically, they’re still working the jazz-rock sound of Pretzel Logic and Katy Lied, but those records had great pop songs, while The Royal Scam sounds good, but doesn’t have the melodies of earlier Dan records.  A transitional record, I suppose, to their more abstract stuff later on.
                As I said in the intro, the two big sounds this year were the birth of punk and developments in reggae.  Roots-reggae has a solid year this year, sounding less like it is treading water than it had in the last couple of years.  Toots is continuing to push his soul-reggae sound, and at this point is doing an evolved version of the Stax sound more credibly than Al Green, who’s been infected with that awful smooth-sax sound like the solo Beatles were last year.  Meanwhile, all three original Wailers release solo records this year, and they’re all excellent.  Interestingly, contrary to the conventional images of them, Marley is the more stridently political & angry one on Rastaman Vibration, while Peter Tosh is the mellower, calmer one on Legalize It.  Bunny Wailer, however, puts out the best record of the three with his dubwise career high, Blackheart Man.  If Marley is strident and Tosh is mellow, Bunny is getting mystical, which fits well with the spacier sonics of dub. 
                Dub has been floating around the margins for a few years, but at least in my collection, this is the year that dub really explodes, in a way I can only compare to how psychedelia broke in rock in ’67.  Not to get all lit-crit about it, but it’s a downright post-modern genre, breaking down a song to its most basic elements and playing around with building it back up.  Not too different, theoretically, I suppose, from the minimalism of the Ramones and (especially, but later) Wire.  But pretentious critical theory aside, there are some great dub records out this year.  I already mentioned Bunny Wailer’s Blackheart Man, but Augustus Pablo & King Tubby’s King Tubby Meets Rockers Uptown might be the best record in the whole genre.  Apparently this album took years to make, and it’s clearly the product of meticulous craftsmanship.  Awhile ago in this project, I talked about the importance of knowing your craft and building a foundation before you start breaking it down, and this is another great example of that.  Both Pablo & Tubby had been active for years in reggae, and knew exactly what they were doing.  Similarly, Lee ‘Scratch’ Perry had been showing up as a producer since the late ‘60s, but this year really begins, in his own words, his dub revolution.  What’s really interesting to note is the range of style he works with, from the deep dup of the Upsetters (his band) to the more roots sound of Junior Murvin to the downright retro rocksteady of the Heptones.  It’s a nice reminder of the diversity of the Jamaican scene.
                Finally, it’s another strong year for funk.  The harder funk of James Brown is mostly absent, but the sprawling P-Funk sound probably reaches its peak here, with Parliament’s masterpiece Mothership Connection (which, I now realize, iTunes dated wrong, but I missed that last year, so I’ll talk about it now).  I’ve mentioned the glam-funk similarities, but they’ve probably never been clearer than on this record, funk’s own Ziggy Stardust.  Elsewhere, funk is starting to reach an accord with disco, bringing the more metronomic beat into a more rubbery funk sound.  At this point, it’s pretty compelling, regardless of what it may develop into.

Song of the Year:  The Ramones – “Blitzkrieg Bop.”  But of course.  When the Ramones are playing, it’s hard not to convince me that they’re the greatest band in the world, and they emerged fully-formed on their debut single.
Album of the Year:  Stevie Wonder – Songs In The Key Of Life.  It’s not Stevie’s best album, as at 2 lps plus an ep, it’s got room for filler (to my ears, most of side one except “Sir Duke” and the extended codas of some of the stuff on LP 2), but it’s magnificent in its sprawl, touching on all the various shades of funk, soul, fusion, Latin, and whatever other genres you can think of.  In a sense even more impressive than the White Album, for being all the product of a single artist.  Of course, The Ramones has virtually none of those virtues, with all the songs sounding very similar and barely half an hour long, but is still my runner-up.
Artist Most Benefiting from Reevaluation:  AC/DC.  Obviously I was aware of how great AC/DC were, but they’re the most Ramones-like in their position of any band in ’76.  More trad than the Ramones, obviously, but similarly a welcome return to simple, straight-ahead rocking after the virtuosic complexity of prog and the distracting theatrics of glam.
Artist Most Diminished in Reevaluation:  I’m cheating slightly here by picking a comp, Wanted! The Outlaws, by Waylon Jennings, Willie Nelson, Jessi Colter, and Tompall Glaser.  But it’s held up as a triumph for a return to basics from the countrypolitan sounds of mainstream country, and it’s nothing that wasn’t already being done by country-rockers like the Flying Burrito Brothers, as well as Jennings and Nelson themselves.  A popularization rather than a breakthrough, therefore, and not so much a leap forward for country, as much as country realizing that country-rockers were doing it better at this point…
Album List
ABBA - Gold
AC/DC - AC/DC
AC/DC - Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
AC/DC - High Voltage
Aerosmith - Aerosmith's Greatest Hits
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Augustus Pablo - King Tubbys Meets Rockers Uptown [Bonus Tracks]
Blondie - Best Of Blondie
Blue Öyster Cult – Agents of Fortune
Bob Dylan - Desire
Bob Dylan - Hard Rain
Bob Dylan - Live 1961-2000: Thirty-Nine Years of Great Concert Performances
Bob Dylan - Vol. 3: Rare And Unreleased, 1974-1991
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Rastaman Vibration
Boston – Boston
Bunny Wailer - Blackheart Man Remastered & Extended
Count Basie - Basie Jam 2
Crosby, Stills & Nash (& Young) - Carry On
David Bowie - Best Of Bowie
David Bowie - Changesbowie
David Bowie – Station To Station
Devo - Pioneers Who Got Scalped: The Anthology
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Fleetwood Mac - The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac
Frank Zappa - Zoot Allures
Genesis – Wind & Wuthering
George Harrison - Best Of Dark Horse 1976-1989
Goblin - Goblin
J.J. Cale - Very Best Of
James Brown - 20 All Time Greatest Hits!
Jeff Beck – Wired
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
Jethro Tull - Songs From The Wood
Joe Strummer - Elgin Avenue Breakdown Revisited (The 101'ers)
Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers - The Beserkley Years: The Best Of Jonathan Richman And The Modern Lovers
Judas Priest - Sad Wings of Destiny
Led Zeppelin - Presence
Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains The Same
Lou Reed - Collections
Max Romeo - Arkology I: Dub Organiser
Michael Jackson - The Essential Michael Jackson
Neil Young - Decade
Nick Lowe - Basher: The Best Of Nick Lowe
Old & In The Way – Old & In The Way
Parliament - Tear The Roof Off 1974-1980
Patti Smith - Outside Society
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Peter Tosh – Legalize It
Queen - Greatest Hits
Rainbow – Rising
Ringo Starr - Photograph: The Very Best Of Ringo Starr
Rush – All The World’s A Stage
Rush - Chronicles
Steely Dan – The Royal Scam
Stephen Stills – Illegal Stills
Stevie Wonder - At The Close Of A Century [Disc 3]
Stevie Wonder – Songs In The Key Of Life
T. Rex - 20th Century Boy: The Ultimate Collection
The Damned - Misc.
The Ethiopians - Everything Crash: The Best of The Ethiopians
The Grateful Dead – Steal Your Face
The Modern Lovers - The Modern Lovers
The Ramones - Mania
The Ramones - Ramones
The Rolling Stones – Black & Blue
The Rolling Stones - Forty Licks
The Stills-Young Band – Long May You Run
The Upsetters - Arkology II: Dub Shepherd
The Upsetters - Arkology III: Dub Adventurer
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers - Playback I: The Big Jangle
Toots & The Maytals - Time Tough - The Anthology
V/A - Back In The Day Jamz
V/A - Beleza Tropical: Brazil Classics 1
V/A - Children Of Nuggets
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Russ's Punk Mix
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
V/A - Saturday Night Fever
V/A - Trojan Dub Massive Chapter I
V/A – Wanted! The Outlaws
Waylon Jennings - Best Of Waylon Jennings
Willie Nelson - The Sound In Your Mind

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

1975


                1975 a little bit better than ’74, although still not as good as the preceding years.  Really, it’s kind of a year of people starting to grope around for new (or in some cases old) sounds, but not finding anything too much yet.  Glam, for instance, is completely gone by ’74, with all of the still-active acts moving on to some other kind of sound.   Overall, this is a year with a few signs of things to come (disco, punk, and new wave), but also more of genres stagnating or fading. 
Being neither a 50 year-old club rat or an obscure-disco hipster, I can’t tell you much about what’s happening in disco proper in 1975.  I can say, though, that disco started to percolate into mainstream rock acts earlier than I realized.  The Bee-Gees are probably the most prominent rockers to go disco, so much so that their earlier folk-pop has been almost forgotten, but I didn’t realize they went disco so early.  Also going disco are the Electric Light Orchestra, with a song that you could swear was a Bee-Gees song (“Evil Woman”) and Roxy Music.  Disco seems to be a good fit for glam refugees, who have always grounded their artier impulses with a fairly simple backbeat. Substituting the mechanized beat of disco isn’t so different, at least for a band like Roxy.  I’m pretty grateful that Mott broke up rather than gracing us with a disco record, though.  Of course, they probably would have ended up sounding more like Bad Company anyway.
I’d always thought of disco as coming out of funk, but it’s actually pretty remarkably different.  Disco’s steady pulse actually puts me more in the mood of its later, even more mechanized, techno successors, or, if you’re looking for a forbearer, the motorik sound of Neu! and Kraftwerk (not that the Krautrockers are even remotely danceable).  Funk, on the other hand, is considerably looser and more anarchic.  George Clinton especially thrives on an anything-can-happen vibe, the kind of looseness that requires a really tight band.  So I’m also fairly pleased that Bowie is still playing in the realm of soul & funk rather than disco, although he puts out two singles and an otherwise pretty-dire album.  Still, “Fame” is remarkably credible funk for someone who was doing psychedelic folk-rock 8 years prior.  And “Young Americans” does a much better job of going soul than the rather dire attempts on last years’s David Live.  That awful Sanborn sax sound has, though, started to infect other parts of the music world, most notably the Beatles.  Both Harrison and McCartney take slight songs (“You” & “Listen To What The Man Says”) and slather a heavy coat of smooth mediocre sax on top, just to make sure they’re not only mediocre but dated.  This, for me at least, more than anything reminds me of being in the grocery store as a little kid in the 80s.  That's not a compliment.
Also interestingly starting to move into the realm of funk are Led Zeppelin.  Their double-lp this year, Physical Graffiti, was a hard one for me to contextualize, since Zep heretofore had always sounded much more in touch with what was going on around them, and now sounded much more backward-looking.  So upon further research, it explained a lot that the album was about half outtakes from III, IV, and Houses of the Holy.  A lot of the rest, meanwhile, sounds much more influenced by James Brown than anyone else.  This is especially the case for songs like “Custard Pie” and “Trampled Under Foot” (although the later also leans fairly heavily on the “Superstition” riff).  I seem to be comparing James Brown much more to rock artists than other funk artists.  But Zep, like Brown, are basically relying on the band hammering out a series of riffs for the lead singer to play off of in a much less structured way than, say, the increasingly prog-influenced and structured sounds of Sabbath or Deep Purple.  It makes me want to hear some live Zeppelin from this period of their career, instead of the earlier stuff that makes up all of their official releases to date.
Not that it sounds anything like Zeppelin, but since he was also a Yardbirds guitarist, it’s probably as good a place as anywhere to talk about Jeff Beck’s Blow By Blow, in which Beck trades in his forgettable heavy blues rock sound for some pretty fantastic (and all vocal-free) jazz fusion.  It sounds very much of its time, of course, somewhere between Billy Cobham and Stevie Wonder.  In its own weird way, between the Zep/Bowie funk moves and Beck’s fusion sound, the worlds of rock and R&B sound more in dialogue with each other in 1975 than at any year since 1966. 
If the glam artists have moved toward dancier sounds and away from 50s/60s rock & roll as their point of reference, other artists seem to have moved more into that space.  Both Lennon and Springsteen are doing their best to chase the Phil Spector sound, although Lennon cheats a little by actually hiring Spector to produce his rock & roll covers album.  Like virtually all covers albums, it’s pretty unnecessary, although Lennon does still have a good voice for this kind of material.  Springsteen unambiguously does better, though, with one of the best albums of his career.  It’s often described (including by the Boss himself) as a Dylan-meets-Spector sound, but for me Van Morrison still sounds like much more of a touchstone than Dylan.  This is most obvious on tracks that may as well be Morrison songs like “10th Avenue Freeze-Out”, but it’s more just that Springsteen, like Morrison, is much more of a soul-style belter than a Dylanesque (or, for that matter Lennon-esque) sneerer. 
You also hear pre-67 echoes among artists that will eventually be called punk, although I don’t think you’d describe either Joe Strummer or Patti Smith as “punk” if you heard them at the time.  Strummer’s pre-Clash band, the 101ers, basically sound like a bar band (or pub-rock band, if you want to use the nomenclature) who, like all good bar bands, really wanted to be the Rolling Stones circa 1965.  They’re sloppy & fun, but if Strummer hadn’t gone on to do bigger & better things, there’s absolutely zero chance than anyone would be listening to the 101ers 37 years later.  Patti Smith, on the other hand, with her connections in the NYC art & music world, and the fact that she made a pretty excellent album, would still be listened to.  We’ve already encountered Smith before, insofar as she was a lyricist/songwriter for Blue Öyster Cult, and what’s interesting listening to Horses in this context is that it makes sense.  I’d always heard Smith’s early stuff as early punk-rock, but it really does sound pretty close to what BOC were doing on albums like Secret Treaties, if somewhat artier.
If we’re starting to hear from punk rockers, we’re also starting to hear things that sound like New Wave.  The Talking Heads haven’t got a record out, but do have some demos, which sound a lot like the pre-disco Roxy Music, without the production and with a more nervy, less crooner-ish vocalist.  Also presaging New Wave is about half of Neu!’s last record.  With Neu! 75, they finally manage to make an overall solid album, instead of the mix of genius and barely-listenable tracks on their first two records.  Of course, it’s really more like 2 eps, one from each of the two  creative forces of a band about to break up.  Side One is a pretty solid continued exploration of the motorik sound.  Side Two is much more conventionally rockish, by Neu! standards at least: vocals and a backbeat, but with a synthetic sound that inevitably points more toward New Wave.
Kraftwerk, meanwhile, also manage to put out a cohesive album, and while I like Neu! better both for coming first and hitting higher highs, I have to grant that Kraftwerk make better albums.  Radio Activity is unjustly overshadowed by Autobahn and Trans-Europe Express, and doesn’t have a breakout single, but it might be my favorite of the three.  Autobahn got bogged down in less-than-thrilling side-2 experiments, but Radio Activity is made up of clever short pieces throughout.  Much like Eno, Kraftwerk have started packing their ideas into shorter packages, making a kind of prog that isn’t consumed with side-long suites but is no less ambitious.
Eno, meanwhile, is also starting to recall Neu! this year, but the more ambient Neu!  He hasn’t gone all the way ambient, as there are still real songs among the soundscapes.  By the joys of shuffling songs, I’ve also learned that “Another Green World” makes an odd but appropriate coda for Springsteen’s “Meeting Across The River”, but it’s overall much more languid and instrumentally-based.  And not too different from Pink Floyd, kinda.   Floyd are much more conventional in their soncis than Eno or Neu! (Gilmore never sounds more like Eric Clapton than on “Shine On”), but they’re similarly focused on languid and melancholy instrumental pieces.
Not nearly so strong a year for more conventional prog.  Crimson is gone, and Yes have decided to release a series of solo albums in lieu of a new Yes record.  I’ve heard the Steve Howe album (it’s alright, but not especially Yes-like) and I’ve heard good things about Jon Anderson’s, but even I’m not a big enough Yesfan to track down out of print albums by Patrick Moraz and Alan White.  I can say that Chris Squire’s lone solo album is well worth the time of any Yesfan, though, and sounds more like classic Yes than anything after Going For The One.  This isn’t too surprising, as most of the various Yesmen guest on it in various spots.  Also, Squire’s voice is thinner than Anderson’s but not too dissimilar.  His harmonies lean more toward the Beach Boys than CSN, though.
Tull are left therefore as more-or-less the standard bearers for classic prog, then, and they do pretty well with the first of what I think of as the “title-track” albums, a run where the title track is pretty unambiguously the best track on the record.  Minstrel in the Gallery moves back to a more classic Tull sound than last year’s glam experiments, with both more folk elements and more hard rock parts.  I can easily overstate the brief Tull-Sabbath connection, but I’ve always thought that the electric guitar parts on “Minstrel in the Gallery” are among the more Sabbath-sounding in the Tull catalogue.  Sabbath, meanwhile, have moved away from their classic sound, to something that’s harder and less heavy, sounding closer to, say, Deep Purple.  Deep Purple break up this year, and their most prominent successor group (Rainbow) put out their first album with future Sabbath singer Ronnie James Dio. 
The biggest news in prog/hard rock as far as I’m concerned, however, is that Rush are starting to take off.  Last year they were around but unremarkable in their Sabbath-Zeppelin sound, but now are starting to get worth noticing (not least because Neil Peart is involved).  I didn’t realize how late Rush were to the prog scene, and at this point they mostly sound like an ambitious hard-rock band rather than a prog band, but they do have a pair of 12+ minute epics that recall the early reach-exceeding-grasp work of Pink Floyd (although actually borrow more heavily from the Velvet Underground).   Also they release “Bastille Day,” a song I feel compelled to listen to every July 14.
The biggest news in rock generally, however, is undoubtedly the first really great Dylan album since 1967’s John Wesley Harding.  Blood On The Tracks sounds classic even out of context, but I gain a newfound appreciation for how great it must have sounded after almost a decade of genre experiments, deliberately half-assed records, soundtracks, and middling songcraft.  Even more to Dylan’s credit is that it’s not just a return to his classic sound.  If anything, it most closely resembles Neil Young in his acoustic-confessional mode (like the softer moments of After The Gold Rush or Harvest).  Unlike Young, however, Dylan’s moved beyond adolescent (if eloquent) self-pity to much more adult emotional content.  Really, the only other rock lyricist being similarly lyrically mature is Pete Townshend.  Realizing this gives me a newfound appreciation of The Who By Numbers, which I’d otherwise considered their weakest since their 2nd.  But goofy novelty song aside (and worth it for the scene in Freaks & Geeks), The Who By Numbers sees Townshend really writing some respectable lyrics.  I generally cringe at confessional-style songwriting, but I give Pete credit for not doing the adolescent self-pity thing, but really exploring more adult issues.  If I didn’t know how the Who’s story ended, it would make me extremely optimistic for them going forward.
Speaking of Neil Young, I should point out that Neil’s not guilty of any kind of adolescent self-pity thia year, although on at least one of his two albums this year, he’s by no means a happy man.  I understand why people respect Tonight’s The Night, but it’s such a wake of an album that it’s hardly much fun to listen to, nor does it have the energy of Time Fades Away.  Much better, in my mind, is Zuma, which is as close to an archetypal Neil Young album as you’ll find, with long rumbling guitar solos, cryptic lyrics, and a loping, grungy sound.  It also includes what, as far as I know, is the only “secret” CSNY reunion buried on any of the respective members’ albums.  “Secret” CSN reunions, where the other two appear on one’s solo album, seem pretty common - there’s one on Still’s solo record this year – and Young will appear on Crosby albums, or Nash on Stills albums or whatever, but as far as I know this is the only appearance of all four outside of a formal CSNY record.  The rest of CSNY, by the way, are looking much less impressive than Young.  Crosby & Nash have another duo record, and they’re definitely moving more toward the soft-rock side of things than the folk-rock end.  Stills is a little better on his solo record, and sounds good, but (apart from a Neil Young cover) the songs aren’t really there. 
Too bad for CSNY, as they’re seeing a major challenger to their soft rock/folk rock crown in the form of a revitalized Fleetwood Mac, with all the harmony singing and interpersonal drama of CSNY, even if their sound is a little more upbeat.  I’d say more produced too, but that’s not really the case when compared to the slick records from C&N and Stills this year.  Catchier songs, though.
Finally, no Stones record this year except for the odds & sods cash-in Metamorphosis, the first time since 1963, but there are a plethora of bands that want to be the Stones.  Lynyrd Skynrd obviously have been around for a while before this, but by ’75 they’ve moved to sounding much more like the Stones than anyone else, at least on rockers like the mixed-message pair of anti-gun “Saturday Night Special” and pro-bullets “Gimme Back My Bullets.”  It suits them well, especially since they sound dreadful on more straight-country fare (and they certainly sound nothing like the Allmans anymore).  Moving up the East Coast, Aerosmith have their big breakthrough record, which is called Zeppelin-like as often as it is Stonesy, but since Aerosmith can more credibly swing than Zeppelin, I’ve always heard them as Stonesy.  I don’t quite know what it says that a pair of America’s most prominent 70s rock bands tried so hard to sound like a British band that more than anything wanted to sound like Chicago blues acts, but there you go.  Outside of America, too, the Stones’ sound to my ears is a big influence on AC/DC, whose Australian debut is this year.  Of course, given their heavier beat, they also sound more like glam, which really wanted to sound like the Stones anyway.  But they’ve got a heavier version of Stones riffs and they can swing in their own way, so it all adds up to probably the most exciting debut of the year.
Song of the Year:  In almost any other artist’s hands, it wouldn’t work, but “Thunder Road” is Springsteen’s greatest single, so gets the nod.  Epic in all the right ways.
Album of the Year:  Blood on the Tracks isn’t my favorite Dylan album (it’s not quite as good as the Bringing It All Back Home – John Wesley Harding run), but I’d be lying if I didn’t’ say it has long been an album I’ve loved a great deal.  Honorable mention, though, to Jeff Beck’s Blow By Blow, which was pretty much the soundtrack to me doing math homework in college.  Despite that, I still love that one too…
Artist Most Benefiting from Reevaluation:  I know they just got marked down last year, but this year it’s Kraftwerk, who have moved beyond the motorik sound already and succeed where Neu! failed in making a cohesive album.
Artist Most Diminished in Reevaluation:  Stephen Stills.  Based on his earlier records, I always kind of assumed I’d find it worthwhile to get more Still solo records.  It seems I was mistaken.  Not bad, but not really memorable either.  Still, better than the hippie self-parody Crosby & Nash have drifted into.
Album List
ABBA - Gold
AC/DC - AC/DC
Aerosmith - Aerosmith's Greatest Hits
Aerosmith – Toys In The Attic
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Black Sabbath - Past Lives
Black Sabbath - Sabotage
Bob Dylan – Blood On The Tracks
Bob Dylan - Live 1961-2000: Thirty-Nine Years of Great Concert Performances
Bob Dylan - Vol. 3: Rare And Unreleased, 1974-1991
Bob Dylan - Vol. 5: Live 1975 - The Rolling Thunder Revue
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Legend
Bob Marley & The Wailers – Live!
Brian Eno - Another Green World
Bruce Springsteen - Born To Run
Bruce Springsteen - Hammersmith Odeon, London '75 [Live]
Bruce Springsteen - The Essential Bruce Springsteen
Chris Squire – Fish Out Of Water
Clifton Chenier - Bogalusa Boogie
Crosby, Stills & Nash (& Young) - Carry On
David Bowie - Best Of Bowie
David Bowie - Changesbowie
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Fela Kuti - The Best Best Of Fela Kuti
Fleetwood Mac – Fleetwood Mac
Fleetwood Mac - The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac
George Harrison - The Best Of George Harrison
Goblin - Goblin
J.J. Cale - Very Best Of
James Brown - The Big Payback: 1971-1975
Jeff Beck – Blow By Blow
Jethro Tull – Minstrel In The Gallery
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
Joe Strummer - Elgin Avenue Breakdown Revisited (The 101'ers)
John Lennon - Imagine Soundtrack
John Lennon – Rock ‘n’ Roll
Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers - The Beserkley Years: The Best Of Jonathan Richman And The Modern Lovers
Kraftwerk – Radio Activity
Led Zeppelin - Physical Graffiti
Leonard Cohen - The Best Of
Lynyrd Skynyrd - All-Time Greatest Hits
Neil Young - Decade
Neil Young - Tonight's The Night
Neil Young - Zuma
NEU! - NEU! 75
Parliament - Tear The Roof Off 1974-1980
Patti Smith - Outside Society
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: History
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here
Queen - Classic Queen
Queen - Greatest Hits
Richard & Linda Thompson - Hokey Pokey [Bonus Tracks]
Richard & Linda Thompson - Pour Down Like Silver
Rod Stewart & The Faces - The Best Of Faces: Good Boys When They're Asleep
Roxy Music - The Best Of Roxy Music
Rush - Chronicles
Sly & The Family Stone - The Essential Sly & The Family Stone
Steely Dan - A Decade of Steely Dan
Steely Dan – Katy Lied
Stephen Stills – Stills
Talking Heads - Sand In The Vaseline
The Ethiopians - Everything Crash: The Best of The Ethiopians
The Kinks - Celluloid Heroes
The Rolling Stones – Metamorphosis
The Staple Singers - The Very Best Of The Staple Singers
The Who - The Ultimate Collection
The Who – The Who By Numbers
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers - Playback V: Through The Cracks
V/A - Back In The Day Jamz
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
V/A - Saturday Night Fever
V/A - Trojan Dub Massive Chapter I
Willie Nelson - Red Headed Stranger

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

1974


                So 1974, not so hot a year.  ’73 was a step down from ’72, but still had a lot of bright spots.  By ’74, there are still some quite good albums, and some interesting things happening on the margins, but the overall sense I get is that it’s a year where a lot of things stagnated or started to decline.  If after listening to ’73, I was thinking the punks were overstating how bad the previous years were, now I start to see what they were talking about a little.  In part, this is because things are stagnating, but it’s also in part because a lot of the big names (Zeppelin, Floyd, Sabbath, Gaye, among others) sit this year out.
                Of course, a couple of stray songs in my collection remind me that my listening project, reflecting my own musical collection, is far from representative of what the average listener was going through.  Thanks to hindsight, I have a much easier time locating the bright spots that others missed, and I’m skipping over a lot of mainstream dross that I have no need or desire to obtain.  This I’m reminded of as “Hooked on a Feeling” and (especially) “Please Come to Boston for the Weekend” show up in my shuffling, songs I obtained either on soundtracks or ironically, and are really, really bad.  So glad for once that this project includes some big blind spots.
                Of course, as I alluded to above, the bright spots are getting fewer and farther between in ’74.  This is maybe most obvious in glam, which is dying as a scene this year.  Mott The Hoople put out their last album, and a couple of solid singles aside, it’s a considerable step down from their last two, leaning much more heavily on a retro-‘50s sound that just not as compelling as their more Stones-y earlier work.  Eno is still doing interesting stuff, but it’s increasingly abstracted from glam.  In a sense it reminds me of Zappa, insofar as it’s drifting off into its own idiosyncratic world, removed from the rest of what’s going on.  This, incidentally, is one of the reasons I haven’t talked much about Zappa, as he often doesn’t relate much to what else is going on.  Roxy kinda sound like Eno, but they’re drifting toward a more mainstream dance sound.  Not bad, though. 
Bowie is also getting artier, and incorporating a stronger soul influence.  The latter is especially clear on his until-recently out-of-print live album.  I guess Bowie deserves credit for a live album that doesn’t just sound like re-recordings of the studio cuts, but I’m not sure slathering the kind of smooth-jazz saxophone you hear on a grocery store PA over Ziggy Stardust tracks is a real step forward (and as I look at the liners, I discover that said sax is in fact played by yacht-rock maestro David Sanborn – so smooth, so bland).  Interestingly, the only song that benefits from this treatment is the oldest; “The Width of A Circle” from way back on Man Who Sold The World.  Curious that this got a release, while nothing from the Ziggy tour was released until years later. Bowie’s studio album this year is tagged as incorporating soul influences, but basically that just means it swings a bit more than his previous stuff.  This, in turn, makes him sound considerably more like the Rolling Stones, especially on “Rebel, Rebel,” a song some portion of my readership (who shall remain nameless) thought was the Rolling Stones when first they heard it. 
The Stones themselves, meanwhile, are sounding more glam this year, although they lean closer to T. Rex than Bowie, esp. on “It’s Only Rock & Roll (But I Like It)”.  It’s Only Rock & Roll (the album) isn’t quite a complete glam makeover, but they’re definitely incorporating more of the glam sound, in a circular bit of influence.  It also makes it clear that the Stones’ greatest weapon is their rhythm section, as that band could swing so much more naturally than pretty much any other British band ever, and better than most rock bands anyway.  Even as they enter their follower phase, the Stones still kick up a pretty good racket, at least.
                On the margins of glam, Queen are pretty interesting, sounding at times quite close to Mott, insofar as their rock is both harder than Bowie or T. Rex and cut with older styles (music hall for Queen, 50s rock for Mott).  ELO, who I’d previously also tagged as glam-prog, no longer really fit that bill, although I’m liking them better and better.  At this point, though, their orchestrated pop sound most recalls Wings, of any of their contemporaries.  Wings, for what it’s worth, only put out a single this year, but it’s one of their best (“Junior’s Farm”).
                Unlike glam, prog actually has a pretty good year this year.  Tull put out a pretty good album, returning to shorter-form songs with a distinct glam influence.  They haven’t “gone glam” or anything, and it’s not as glam sounding as the Stones, but I think of it as analogous to when 90s Brit bands like Blur & Oasis would incorporate electronica elements into their sound: it shows they’re aware of their contemporaries, but it’s not a wholesale reinvention.  It works on “Bungle In The Jungle,” at least.  The War Child album as a whole, though, is solid but unremarkable.
                The other big prog bands return to form by revamping their sound as well, or at least Yes and King Crimson do.  In both cases, you might call their shift more “metallic,” although in Crimson’s case it would mean “sounding more like Black Sabbath,” while for Yes it means “sounds more like metal on metal,” thanks to new keyboardist Patrick Moraz’s at-times harsh synth sound.  I understand why a lot of people hate on Relayer, since it’s a much meaner-sounding record than anything else in the Yes catalogue, but it’s probably my 3rd favorite of their albums (after The Yes Album and Close To The Edge, but above the highly-uneven Fragile).  It also offers a good idea of why Tales didn’t work: every other Yes album to this point pushed their sound forward in some way, but Tales was Yes treading water, and that’s death to a band like this.  Relayer, on the other hand, shows not only a more aggressive sound, but also elements that recall Bitches Brew-era Miles Davis.  It’s probably their hardest-rocking album, and shows them once again shifting their sonic palette to great effect.  King Crimson, meanwhile, put out probably my favorite of their albums, although it’s one that for me coasts primarily on guitar tone.  Not that the songs aren’t solid, but Fripp has seemingly developed his variation on the Tony Iommi’s classic Master of Reality fuzz, and like that album, Red is practically a concept album about guitar tone.  Small wonder it was one of Kurt Cobain’s favorites.
                Finally, on the margins of prog, I just mentioned above that Zappa’s disconnect from the broader musical world means I seldom have cause to mention him, but it does sound to me like Apostrophe’ is a parody of concept albums & rock operas, and a pretty solid one, insofar as I’m fairly certain its long, rambling, incoherent story is deliberately so.  Of course, lyrics generally seem like something of an afterthought to Zappa, so who knows?
                Someone for whom lyrics are emphatically not an afterthought, however, is Bob Dylan, who releases his first proper studio album since 1970.  You’d never guess there was a 4 year gap between New Morning and Planet Waves, though, so close they are in sound.  Especially with the long gap, it can’t help but feel a little underwhelming.  Disappointing too for the Band, for whom Planet Waves is the first non-covers album since 1971’s Cahoots.  I suspect, given that it was the first non-soundtrack/outtake album from Dylan and non-covers album for the Band, that it was a touch overrated at the time.  Now, it’s probably my least favorite Dylan album since Times They Are A’Changing, not counting Dylan.  Pleasant enough, though, and I do like songs like “On A Night Like This” and “Forever Young,” but there’s nothing here as good as last year’s “Knocking On Heaven’s Door.”  Still, he’s already in ’74 laying down the studio tracks for his real return to form next year, the bootleg NYC sessions for which I’m listening to this year. 
                Two other major folk-rock singer-songwriters have very good years.  Richard Thompson, whose solo debut was good but slight, records what might be his greatest album.  If you haven’t heard I Want To See The Bright Lights Tonight, and have any interest in folk-rock or 70s roots-rock, please seek this one out.  It’s a gem.  Great player, great songwriter, great singers.  Remarkably, Thompson manages to find a singer almost as good as Sandy Denny (his old Fairport singer) in new wife Linda Thompson.  Sonically, it’s quite close to Fairport, although it leans less toward straight purity, and roughs it up a bit with some electric energy.  Neil Young also does quite well this year, continuing his so-called “ditch trilogy” of angry, grungy albums.  On The Beach was the third recorded but second released, and while I like Time Fades Away just a hair more, that’s largely based on the ragged energy of the live record.  On The Beach probably has better songs overall, and certainly is a little more clear-eyed lyrically, if still wholly disgusted with the whole increasingly mellow LA folk-rock scene.  Both Young and Thompson manage to make much more compelling cases for the continued vitality of the genre as a whole, though – stronger than Dylan, at any rate.  Also, it’s fun to hear Neil Young’s answer song (“Walk On”) to Lynyrd Skynyrd’s answer song (“Sweet Home Alabama”) to Young’s own “Alabama” and “Southern Man.”  It’s like a hip-hop feud, only between a Canadian folkie and Southern rednecks.  Although I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Skynyrd make sure to put an ode to an old black bluesman (“Curtis Loew”) on the same album to underline the idea that they’re proud Southerners but not racists.  Overall, a step down from their debut, though, sounding much more conventionally boogieing, and stepping back from the big epics of last year.
                Elsewhere in the realm of hard rock, we’re missing a bunch of the big guns.  Both Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath sit out ’74.  The Who’s Odds ‘n Sods is just that, and as is the nature of these sort of things, contains some great stuff (“Pure & Easy), some interesting obscurities (“Postcard,” which recalls the whimsical side of Cream), & some weird stuff (I love their anti-smoking PSA, rejected by the American Cancer Society for being too dark).  It also has their most generic hit (“Long Live Rock”).  One thing I’m definitely struck by is that, while the Who were generally excellent in quality in the ‘70s, they were well below-average in terms of productivity.  There are only 2 more proper Who albums in the whole decade, a sharp contrast to most of their much more prolific peers.  Perhaps that’s why they were one of the first active groups to put out one of these outtakes comps.
Elsewhere in hard rock, Deep Purple is in the process of grinding to a halt.  New singers David Coverdale and Glenn Hughes (to become vocalists for Jimmy Page and Black Sabbath later on, respectively) rock credibly on greatest-hits tracks like “Burn” and “Stormbringer,” but the Stormbringer album itself is pretty rough going after the title track.  For some reason, Coverdale & Hughes try to turn Deep Purple into a roots-soul outfit, sounding closer to Traffic than anything in Purple’s prog or metal past.  Traffic is starting to sink in my estimation after this and last year’s Badger album, as I realize how much they, like Led Zeppelin are a great band but a horrible influence.  Blue Oyster Cult this year are out-Purpling Deep Purple in the organ-driven hard rock sound, at least, and with better lyrics to boot.  Secret Treaties is certainly my favorite BOC album, although my collection is smaller than it could be, sadly. 
Remarkably, though, they’re not even the best band out of Long Island this year:  Mountain is back!  I am a little surprised at just how excited I am to get Mountain back, after only a couple of years since their last one, but I just really love that fantastic fuzzy/heavy sound.  And it hasn’t changed at all.  The live album from this year is better than the live half of Flowers of Evil, but not a great change.  And Avalanche, their studio album, is only different insofar as it leans more on the heavier tracks than the mellower/folkier end of things.  Also, it’s got my 3rd favorite “Satisfaction” cover (after Otis Redding and Devo).  Admittedly, they basically just turn it into a Mountain song, but as covered above, I love me that Mountain sound.  So I’m pretty sad that this is the end of the line for Mountain…
                Not a lot to report in the realm of soul.  It’s not degenerating like glam (not when songs as good as Al Green’s “Take Me To the River” (I used to think the Talking Heads did this better: I was wrong, and I apologize to Rev. Green) and albums as good as Stevie Wonder’s Fulfillingness’s First Finale come out), but it is kinda treading water.  Soul has always been a more evolutionary than revolutionary genre, but this year there’s not a lot of change from the last.  The same holds for reggae; some very good stuff (especially Marley’s Natty Dread), but largely just a continuation of what was happening last year. 
Funk, however, has a quite good year, esp. as Parliament is finally a going concern.  It’s too bad that glam is dying just as funk is really taking off, as I think there’s an argument that they’re very similar in a lot of ways.  Not musically, obviously, but in their emphasis on sci-fi/fantasy and freaky theatricality, there’s an easy line between Bowie and George Clinton to be drawn.  Incidentally, what I do notice musically is just how much Clinton took his essential sound from Sly & The Family Stone, who are very similar musically this year, if more paranoid and dark in tone than Clinton. 
                James Brown, meanwhile, is pursuing a kind of funk that’s fairly radically different from what Clinton’s up to, with much tighter arrangements that at times recall the big band jazz of an earlier era.  I begin to think that Soul On Top, Brown’s deliberate experiment in that style from 1970, may be a crucial one in explaining his development.  Songs like “Coldblooded” and “Papa Don’t Take No Mess” rock harder than the swing cats, but their horn charts don’t sound too far removed.  Also, if Brown sounds removed from the main trends in funk in 1974, he sounds like a stronger influence on the early-80s funk of Prince and Rick James than P-Funk or the rest of what’s happening in funk this year.  And Prince totally stole his yelp-y scream thing from James Brown.  Also, Brown’s reliance on vamps over the more sprawling sound of P-Funk sounds more like an influence on sample/loop based hip-hop (even if those loops would often be of P-Funk tracks).  Finally, I should note that I mentioned last time that the Stones on “Heartbreaker” sounded closer to Brown than a lot of what else was happening in funk.   Well, this year, “The Big Payback,” for me the apex of Brown’s funk years, reminds me of “Gimme Shelter,” if only in that it maintains a similar groove of sustained menace.  “Payback” is far more danceable, though, and a groove that I don’t want to end.
                I also want to include a last note on Steely Dan.  I guess they sound most like AM soft rock of anything else that’s going on, but they’re also showing a strong, strong jazz influence, covering Ellington and quoting Horace Silver.  Very clever, very catchy music.  So far, I like every Steely Dan album better than the last, I just don’t know where to slot them in.  Unlike Zappa, they don’t sound outside of time, but their sound is so much their own that it’s hard to compare them to much.  Eno maybe, in approach, if not in sound.  Also, the more sophisticated their music gets, the harder time I have juxtaposing the sounds on the record with the dirty hippies on the record jacket…

Song of the Year:  Gram Parsons – “$1000 Wedding.”  I almost gave this one to James Brown’s “The Big Payback,” but “$1000 Wedding” is an instant standard, and that sort of thing doesn’t come along every day.  Plus, while it’s been covered many, many times, I don’t think anyone did it better than Parsons.
Album of the Year:  Big Star – Radio City.  Kind of a surprise for me, as it’s not a record that screams greatness.  If it had come out 5 years earlier or later, when this style of pop-rock was more popular , it probably would have been lost in the shuffle (although paradoxically would have sold more copies).  But it’s really solid, with really good songs.  It’s nothing that the Byrds weren’t doing earlier (or R.E.M. would do later), but c. 1974, only Tom Petty was mining similar territory, and not half as well.  Neil Young, Yes, and Richard & Linda Thompson all deserve runner-up nominations, though. 
Artist Most Benefiting from Reevaluation:  Mountain.  I’ve covered above how unexpectedly excited I was for their return this year, but at this point I’m willing to say that I love Mountain more than their greatest influence Cream.  Their hit-to-miss ratio was much higher, but also a fatter sound and better singing, and a sound that is pretty close to my Platonic ideal of hard rock.  In no small part, the Black Keys are one of my favorite active groups because of the debt they owe Mountain.
Artist Most Diminished in Reevaluation:  Kraftwerk.  It turns out that not only did Neu! do the motorik sound earlier, but they did it better too, always sounding a little less predictable than their ex-bandmates.  It does make me wonder what they would have produced had they all stayed in one group. 

Album List
ABBA - Gold
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Big Star - Radio City
Billy Cobham – Total Eclipse
Blue Öyster Cult – Secret Treaties
Bob Dylan - Blood On The Tracks (New York Sessions)
Bob Dylan - Greatest Hits Volume 3
Bob Dylan - Live 1961-2000: Thirty-Nine Years of Great Concert Performances
Bob Dylan - Vol. 2 : Rare And Unreleased, 1963-1974
Bob Dylan - Vol. 3: Rare And Unreleased, 1974-1991
Bob Dylan & The Band – Planet Waves
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Legend
Bob Marley & The Wailers – Natty Dread
Brian Eno - Taking Tiger Mountain By Strategy
Bruce Springsteen - Misc.
Charles Wright & The Watts 103rd Street Rhythm Band - Express Yourself: The Best Of Charles Wright
Chuck Brown - The Best Of Chuck Brown
Dave Brubeck - Ken Burns Jazz: Dave Brubeck
David Bowie – Aladdin Sane
David Bowie - Changesbowie
David Bowie – David Live
Deep Purple – Stormbringer
Deep Purple - The Very Best Of Deep Purple
Dennis Alcapone - Guns Don't Argue
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Frank Zappa - Apostrophe'
George Harrison - The Best Of George Harrison
Gram Parsons - Grievous Angel
James Brown - 20 All Time Greatest Hits!
James Brown - The Big Payback: 1971-1975
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
Jimmy Buffett - Songs You Know By Heart
Joni Mitchell - Hits
King Crimson - Red
Kraftwerk - Autobahn
Leonard Cohen - The Best Of
Lou Reed - Collections
Lynyrd Skynyrd - All-Time Greatest Hits
Marvin Gaye - Live
Merle Haggard - HAG: The Best Of Merle Haggard
Mott The Hoople - Greatest Hits
Mott The Hoople – Live
Mott The Hoople - The Hoople
Mountain – Avalanche
Mountain – Twin Peaks
Neil Young - Decade
Neil Young – On The Beach
Nick Drake - Way To Blue (An Introduction To Nick Drake)
Nick Lowe - Nutted By Reality
Parliament - Tear The Roof Off 1974-1980
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Queen - Classic Queen
Queen - Greatest Hits
Richard & Linda Thompson - I Want To See The Bright Lights Tonight
Richard & Linda Thompson - Wedding Songs
Ringo Starr - Photograph: The Very Best Of Ringo Starr
Rod Stewart & The Faces - Gold
Roxy Music - The Best Of Roxy Music
Rush - Chronicles
Sly & The Family Stone - The Essential Sly & The Family Stone
Steely Dan - A Decade of Steely Dan
Steely Dan – Pretzel Logic
Stevie Wonder - At The Close Of A Century
Stevie Wonder – Fulfillingness’s First Finale
The Kinks - Celluloid Heroes
The Rolling Stones - Forty Licks
The Rolling Stones – It’s Only Rock & Roll
The Staple Singers - City In The Sky
The Staple Singers - The Very Best Of The Staple Singers
The Who – Odds & Sods
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers - Playback V: Through The Cracks
V/A - Back In The Day Jamz
V/A - Children Of Nuggets II
V/A - Kill Bill, Vol. 1
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Reservoir Dogs
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
V/A - Trojan Dub Massive Chapter I
Van Morrison – It’s Too Late To Stop Now
Yes - Relayer