Thursday, March 8, 2012

1972


                So it’s been a while since last I posted.  I could blame work or sickness, but honestly I think it’s clear that this blog is more important than either my career or health.  Rather, it’s a function largely of how much I had to absorb in 1972.  It’s not so much the best year I’ve encountered (still ’68), but it’s got a lot of stuff going on , and a lot of stuff that seems to be operating in separate discrete worlds.  Even the previously unified world of R&B is starting to splinter now.  Earlier, artists like James Brown and Sly & The Family Stone comfortably straddled the worlds of soul and funk, but by now they’re starting to splinter into very different sounding camps.  I don’t want to overstate this divide, since they still owe a lot to each other, but Funkadelic sounds closer to Captain Beefheart in 1972 than to Isaac Hayes or Curtis Mayfield.  George Clinton and Beefheart share a similar off-kilter sensibility, at any rate.  In soul, on the other hand, I’ve talked about a “cinematic soul” sound as early as ’66, but I mean it a little more literally this time, as both Curtis Mayfield (Superfly) and Marvin Gaye (Trouble Man) try their hands at the blaxploitation soundtrack gig.  They sound very similar, actually, although I give the edge to Mayfield, since he wrote more actual songs, while Gaye tended more toward writing a score, with recurring motifs and chiefly instrumental songs.  Who they both sound the most indebted-to (as did Hayes last year) are the Temptations and their psychedelic-soul sound.  That sound, incidentally, probably peaks this year with “Papa Was A Rolling Stone.” 
                Elsewhere in soul, if Marvin sounds heavily influenced by Isaac Hayes and Curtis Mayfield, Stevie Wonder, esp. on his 1st album of the year, sounds like someone who’s been listening to a lot of What’s Going On.  There’s more funk in Stevie’s sound, and his lyrical concerns are more focused on romantic love than the broader social concerns of Marvin, but especially on “Superwoman,” the song structure shows a clear debt.  Music Of My Mind gets tagged a lot as Wonder’s great leap forward, and I more-or-less buy it, but he really comes into his own on Talking Book, the first of three Stevie Wonder albums no serious music collection can be without.  Music had a synthesis of a lot of Wonder’s broader influences, but Talking Book brings it all together into  pop-song constructions worthy of the classic ‘60s Motown sides.  Also, I’m not sure, but I think Michael Jackson stole his little “hee-hoo!” exclamations from “Maybe Your Baby.”  Jackson, by the way, has a big hit this year with a love song to his pet rat. 
                My last note on soul concerns Al Green, who I grow to appreciate more and more as a natural continuation of that Stax sound into the ‘70s.  One of the fun elements of this project is learning where the influence runs differently than I thought it did.  Being careless with my chronology, I always assumed the horn line in “Love and Happiness” was indebted to Marley’s horn charts circa Exodus¸ but it now becomes clear that the influence probably went in the other direction.  Not a lot from Marley this year, although a couple of my favorite early-reggae gems are from ’72.  The Heptones’ Meet The Now Generation sounds a lot like the early Wailers, and is a minor gem, but ’72 is also the year of The Harder They Come, which probably just about anyone would agree is the one reggae album to own if you’re going to own one.  It’s also (I think) the album that first drew the attention of the broader world to the Jamaican scene in a big way, so I’ll be on the lookout for its influence in coming years…
                In rock, the biggest news is probably that this is the year glam breaks.  Obviously T. Rex had been working this sound for a few albums, but in ’72 we get not only more T. Rex, but also glam makeovers of David Bowie, Mott the Hoople, and Lou Reed, plus Roxy Music’s debut.  For that matter, Elton John rarely sounded glammier than on “Crocodile Rock.”  It’s easy to see why glam made such a splash when it did, since rock otherwise had been moving away from the 3-minute single in  a variety of prog, metal, roots, and soft-rock directions, and glam is very much a return to pop-rock, a la the pre-psychedelic ‘60s.  What’s interesting to me is how the artists under the glam label run the gamut from the Stones-with-glitter sound of Mott to the arty, synth-y Roxy Music, with the others falling somewhere in between.  Although Lou Reed probably deserves a special mention for how poorly he fits with the UK glam acts.  Obviously the presence of Bowie & Mark Ronson on Transformer means it has some common elements, but most of the best songs sound more like (or in some cases actually are) Velvet Underground outtakes, and a lot of the rest have a campier sound that the UK acts don’t really go for.  Also, I don’t think any of the UK glam artists had it in them to write a song like “Perfect Day,” at least not yet.
                Also probably worth noting is the glam-prog of the Electric Light Orchestra.  Obviously Bowie and Roxy Music have art-rock/prog inclinations, but ELO’s take is somewhat different, goofier, and trashier, but still sounds not unlike the string sections T. Rex are experimenting with on songs like “Children of the Revolution.”  Prog itself might hit its peak in ’72, with phenomenal records from both Tull and Yes, both of whom would slip into self-parody next year, as well as the debut of Neu.  Neu!, like all of their albums, is far from perfect, as few of their downtempo experiments work, but full credit for developing a sound that’s strikingly, well, new.  There are elements of bands like the Thirteenth Floor Elevators, and of course the more ragged Can/Amon Düül krautrock, but this is, I think, the birthplace of the motorik sound, the clean, mechanical pulse that both Neu and Kraftwerk (who were all the same band until they splintered in ’71) would work with, and become a key influence on a lot of the new wave, post-punk, and techno to follow.  More conventionally, Thick As A Brick, Close To The Edge, and parts of Fragile though, are about as good as prog gets, although Tull & Yes don’t have much in common sonically with each other apart from a fondness for complex song construction.  Tull continues to develop its idiosyncratic hard-folk approach, while Yes (like Zeppelin last year) is drawing from a wide range of contemporary influences.  Their core sound continues to sound closest to Deep Purple, of any contemporaries, but there are hints of Zeppelin, folk guitar, maybe a touch of funk, and some decidedly CSNY-esque harmonies by Jon Anderson harmonizing with himself. 
                Deep Purple, however, have basically abandoned whatever prog elements lingered on In Rock, in favor of a sound that sounds more like a harder version of Mountain than just about anything else going on.  It seems kind of odd to group them together with Sabbath as metal, since the two sound pretty much nothing alike, and I’m thinking that it’s only later, when bands start appearing influenced by both of them, that they get retroactively grouped together.  If anything, Mott the Hoople sound more like Purple than Sabbath, at least on songs like the future Bad Company hit “Ready for Love.”
                If Mott the Hoople and ZIggy Stardust-era Bowie’s basic sound is ’65-66 Stones with a glam sheen on top, it’s interesting that the Stones themselves don’t sound glammy at all.  If anything, they’ve never sounded as grungy and blues-country-soul-roots focused than they do on Exile On Main St.  There are some similarities with the Kinks on Everybody’s In Show-Biz, insofar as both are bands adding a horn section and looking towards an older American sound, consequently sounding out of place among UK rock acts.  The Kinks, however, are looking much further back, to Dixieland/music hall jazz, and also are deeply uneven in their attempt (their first weak record since their first 3, sadly).  The Stones, meanwhile, put out possibly (probably) the best album of their career, and make a more lived-in version of their Beggars’ Banquet.  Honestly, the band the Stones most sound like in 1972 are the Grateful Dead, an association I never noticed before now, and which may explain why the ’72 is my favorite live Dead year.  (if I were to reduce my live Dead collection to a single album, it would undoubtedly be either Europe ’72 or Hundred Year Hall, both from the same tour).  The Stones are of course harder and tighter (what with the horns and all), while the Dead are mellower and jammier, but compared to the extremes of, say, Deep Purple and Crosby & Nash, they sound very close together.  Compare, say “Big Railroad Blues” to “Casino Boogie,” and tell me you couldn’t hear either band playing the other’s song.  The comparison holds up even more when you compare to other groups mining similar territory.  The Flying Burrito Brothers, for instance, end their career with a post-Gram Parson live album (no, I don’t acknowledge the existence of the post-Parsons and Hillman faux-Burritos which I think still exist).  But the live Burritos, while competent executors of a country-rock sound, don’t have the mélange of rock/soul/country/folk influences that the Dead & Stones do.  Creedence, I suppose, also work a similar terrain, but honestly just sound very bad on their breakup album this year.  It’s not a problem of band democracy, since among the worst songs are some of Fogerty’s compositions.  Rather, their formula is just sounding tired, I think, and increasing the country influence doesn’t help…
                The Dead, incidentally, sound better live this year than the Allmans, fill about half of their Eat A Peach album with tracks from the same show as last year’s Live At The Fillmore.  It’s a fitting tribute for the deceased Duane Allman, except that it’s clear why this stuff was held back from that album.  On the other hand, the first of the post-Duane tracks show great promise for the Allmans going forward.
Another artist attempting to mine a similar sound is Stephen Stills, on his Manassas album (which, for what it’s worth, borrows the Stones’ bassist).  It’s my favorite Stills album, and an interesting concept, with a side each of rock, country, folk, and rock & roll, but 1) it’s more interesting to hear these sounds mashed together into something new and 2) the songs just aren’t really that memorable.  An album I enjoy listening to, and respect in its ambitions, but can’t really say I remember much in way of melodies off of.  So it loses the best-CSNY-album-of-the-year title to Harvest, Neil Young’s oft-maligned mega-hit.  Admittedly, the strings are a little goofy, but listening through this time, I hear them as a last gasp of the orchestral sound Young played with in the Buffalo Springfield and on his solo debut.  As for the remainder of CSNY, Crosby & Nash have joined together for the first of a series of duo records.  It’s…ok, I guess.  The Nash songs sound like Nash country-pop songs and the Crosby songs are in a mellow “Guinevere”/”Déjà Vu” vein, not the rockier side he’s flashed from time to time.  The bigger problem isn’t the unadventurous nature of the sound, though; it’s that none of these songs, except maybe “Southbound Train” would have had any chance of making it onto either Crosby, Stills, and Nash or Déjà Vu.  Although perhaps I should, as I’ve thought of doing for the Beatles in their early solo careers, attempt to construct what a 3rd CSNY album would sound like if assembled out of their ’72 albums.  For what it’s worth, I think Stills would be the hardest-rocking one…
                Elsewhere on the softer side of things, we get the debut and breakout records of a pair of acts that can probably be grouped together for their common approach of mixing mellow sounds with deeply cynical, deceptively mean lyrics.  Not that there’s a great deal otherwise in common between the jazz-pop approach of Steely Dan and the more conventional folk-rock sound of Randy Newman.  Steely Dan are the more interesting sonically, although they sound more conventional here than they will on their later records, while Newman sounds like a missing link between New Morning-era Dylan and the sound of comeback Dylan in a couple of years (musically, not so much lyrically).  Dylan himself, by the way, releases no new music in a calendar year for the first time since his debut single way back in ’62.  Combined with the release last year of his Greatest Hits, Vol. II, you’d be excused for thinking that Dylan was done as a recording artist.
                A couple of notes on artists held up by later generations of alt-rockers as forerunners outside of their time, who both offer a non-glam form of pop-rock.  That tag doesn’t fit Big Star at all, who sound 100% natural sandwiched between Zeppelin and CSNY, and whose sound basically sounds like a mix of Zeppelin-esque rock and the folk-pop of the Byrds and Buffalo Springfield.  So good, but hardly unconventional, except when measured against their Stax labelmantes.  The Modern Lovers, on the other hand, do sound strikingly out of place, mixing a sound that’s somewhere between the Velvets circa Loaded and garage rock with a lyrical sentiment that would have sounded cornball in the heyday of early ‘60s pop.  Sonically not tremendously innovative or anything, although I’m a sucker for organ-driven rock.  Maybe that’s why I love Jonathan Richman’s confessionals, but get bored quick at brokenhearted young people playing guitars with holes in them.  Also, I’ll give credit to Richman for being as much a lyrical original in his own way as Dylan or Reed, even if his rock & roll naïf act would degenerate into shtick in his solo career.
                And while I may have not 4 sentences ago denigrated sensitive young people accompanied by guitars with holes in them, that critique will not extend so far as Nick Drake’s Pink Moon.  Partly that’s because it’s more folk-based (and actually folk-based, not just acoustic-guitar-based), and partly (mostly) it’s because his lyrics and song construction reach a level of abstraction that makes his closest peer sound probably like Van Morrison on Astral Weeks.  Morrison, incidentally, put out yet another record hewing to the Moondance  template.  It’s a good sound, and it suits him, even if I miss Them, but it’s hard to say much about an artist that keeps working such a narrow sonic template year after year. 
                Oh, and I did promise to talk about Elvis this year, since this is the last year I have (most of) an Elvis album.  Elvis Now!  is pretty good in a country-pop sound, lyrically-absentminded cover of “Hey Jude” notwithstanding, but I don’t really have a lot to say about it.  Except that I do kinda love the Band-sounding gospel of “Put Your Hand In The Hand” and the shuffling “I Was Born About Ten Thousand Years Ago,” the song appearing as chopped up interludes on Elvis Country.  Also, non-album single “Burning Love,” while derivative of Elvis’s young-man sound, is probably his last great single.  Finally, speaking of artists moving past their prime, the Beach Boys put out the odd-in-its-conventionality Carl And The Passions – ‘So Tough’.”  If Surf’s Up was probably the most distinctively Beach Boys-sounding record they’d made since ’67, they’ve never sounded less like themselves than on this one, where they decide to sound like an entirely conventional 2nd string roots-rock band.  It’s not bad, but it’s not what you listen to the Beach Boys for, and it’s not a style that plays to their strength.  Plus, they’ve drafted a pair of new members, who contribute a couple of songs of their own that sound so little like the Beach Boys (not even any Wilsons singing!) that it sounds like they were added to the album by mistake…
Song of the Year:  “Roundabout” – Yes.  Fragile isn’t Yes’s best album (that’s Close to the Edge or The Yes Album), but just about everything that made Yes one of my favorite bands is here: the seemless shifting between moods, the nonsensically abstract lyrics, the virtuoso performances in service of the song rather than showboating, the joyous energy.  Not only my favorite Yessong, but I think my favorite prog-rock song, skimping neither on the “prog” nor the “rock.” 
Album of the Year:  Exile on Main St. – The Rolling Stones.  Maybe not the greatest rock album of all time, but the greatest rock & roll album of all time, and without a question in my mind the Stones’ peak.  Also one of a bare handful of albums I refuse to go more than a day or two without having on hand.
Artist Most Benefiting from Reevaluation:  Randy Newman.  I had a vague sense that he was a worthy singer-songwriter, but in his focus on external concerns rather than self-expression and his cynical sense of humor, Newman is more Dylan-like than any of the other “new Dylans” that were hyped around this time.  I think I need more of his albums…
Artist Most Diminished in Reevaluation:  Marvin Gaye.  Just one album after his artistic breakthrough, Marvin’s in follower mode here.  Trouble Man is pretty good, but it’s nothing that Isaac Hayes or Curtis Mayfield didn’t do better on their soundtracks, and it’s kind of a punt after the innovative and experimental What’s Going On?
Album List
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Big Star - #1 Record
Black Sabbath - Vol. 4
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Soul Rebels [Bonus Track Edition]
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Trenchtown Rock: The Anthology 1969-78
Bruce Springsteen - 18 Tracks
Can - Ege Bamyasi
Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band - Clear Spot
Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band - The Spotlight Kid
Charles Wright & The Watts 103rd Street Rhythm Band - Express Yourself: The Best Of Charles Wright
Chuck Brown - The Best Of Chuck Brown
Creedence Clearwater Revival - Chronicle, Vol. 1
Creedence Clearwater Revival – Mardi Gras
Crosby & Nash – Crosby & Nash
Crosby, Stills & Nash (& Young) - Carry On
Curtis Mayfield - Superfly
David Bowie - Changesbowie
David Bowie – The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars
David Bowie - Ziggy Stardust - Live - Santa Monica 20th Oct. 1972
Deep Purple - The Very Best Of Deep Purple
Dennis Alcapone - Guns Don't Argue
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Elton John - Wedding Songs
Elvis Presley - Elvis 30 #1 Hits
Elvis Presley - Elvis Now
Fela Kuti - The Best Best Of Fela Kuti
Funkadelic - America Eats Its Young
Isaac Hayes - Greatest Hits Singles
J.J. Cale – Naturally…
J.J. Cale - Very Best Of
James Brown - 20 All Time Greatest Hits!
James Brown - Make It Funky: 1971-75
Jethro Tull – Living In The Past
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
Jethro Tull – Thick As A Brick
John Lennon - Imagine Soundtrack
Joni Mitchell - Hits
Led Zeppelin - How The West Was Won
Lou Reed - Collections
Lou Reed – Transformer
Marvin Gaye – Trouble Man
Michael Jackson - The Essential Michael Jackson Disc 1
Miles Davis - Get Up With It
Miles Davis - Miles Davis In Concert: Live At Philharmonic Hall
Miles Davis - On the Corner
Mott The Hoople – All The Young Dudes
Mott The Hoople - An Introduction To Mott The Hoople
Mott The Hoople - Greatest Hits
Neil Young - Decade
Neil Young – Harvest
Neil Young – Journey Through The Past
NEU! - NEU!
Nick Drake - Pink Moon
Nick Drake - Way To Blue (An Introduction To Nick Drake)
Os Mutantes - Everything Is Possible!: The Best Of Os Mutantes
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Pink Floyd - Obscured by Clouds
Randy Newman – Sail Away
Richard Thompson - Henry The Human Fly
Ringo Starr - Photograph: The Very Best Of Ringo Starr
Rod Stewart & The Faces - Gold
Roxy Music - The Best Of Roxy Music
Steeleye Span – Below The Salt
Steely Dan - A Decade of Steely Dan
Steely Dan – Can’t Buy A Thrill
Stephen Stills – Manassas
Stevie Wonder - At The Close Of A Century
Stevie Wonder – Music of My Mind
Stevie Wonder – Talking Book
T. Rex - 20th Century Boy: The Ultimate Collection
The Allman Brothers Band – Eat A Peach
The Beach Boys - Carl And The Passions - So Tough
The Ethiopians - Everything Crash: The Best of The Ethiopians
The Flying Burrito Bros. – Last of the Red Hot Burritos
The Grateful Dead – Europe ‘72
The Grateful Dead - Hundred Year Hall
The Heptones - Meet The Now Generation
The Kinks - Celluloid Heroes
The Kinks - Everybody's In Showbiz
The Kinks - The Kink Kronikles
The Modern Lovers - The Modern Lovers
The Rolling Stones - Exile On Main Street
The Rolling Stones - Forty Licks Disc 2
The Staple Singers - Be altitude,respect yourself
The Staple Singers - The Very Best Of The Staple Singers
The Temptations - Psychedelic Soul
The Who - The Ultimate Collection
Toots & The Maytals - Misc.
Toots & The Maytals - Time Tough - The Anthology
V/A - Beleza Tropical: Brazil Classics 1
V/A - Mp3
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Reservoir Dogs
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
V/A - Trainspotting
V/A - Trojan Dub Massive Chapter I
Van Morrison – St. Dominic’s Preview
Yes - Close To The Edge
Yes - Fragile

Thursday, March 1, 2012

1971


                So 1971 seems to be a banner year for two things: live albums and AM radio-style soft rock.  For the former, we get double live albums from the Grateful Dead, the Allman Brothers, and Crosby, Stills, Nash, & Young, the triple-album George Harrison & Friends Concert for Bangladesh, a Traffic live album, and Mountain mimicking Cream some more with a half-live/half-studio breakup album, plus archival live concerts from both Led Zeppelin and Neil Young.  And none of them, except the CSNY and Traffic ones, feel like contractual-obligation filler.  Well, maybe the Mountain one feels like they lacked enough studio tracks, but considering the live half is both really good and a chance to hear “Mississippi Queen” again, I won’t complain.  But the Grateful Dead one (their 2nd official live album) sounds much more like the “classic” rootsy live Dead sound they’d work variations on for the next few decades than the much more psychedelic Live/Dead from ’69.  For my money, they hit their live peak next year, but it’s by deepening the formula already in place here, of rootsy originals and covers, mixed with some extended live improvisation, and all generally keeping with the vibe of last year’s twin studio classics.  The best of the ’71 live albums, however, is to my mind without question the Allman Brothers’ Live At The Fillmore.  I’ve heard it compared more to jazz improvisation than anything else going on in rock, and while the Dead would develop a similar simpatico relationship in their jams, they only rarely brought the high-energy intensity that the Allmans sustain over 4 LP sides.  Similarly, the Who could bring a similar focused intensity, but only in a much more structured fashion, and without nearly the success at improvisation.  All the sadder that Duane Allman dies in 1971, leaving this as his absolute peak, and the rest of the band’s as well. 
                The Concert for Bangladesh is worth noting, if only for the uncanny parallels between Harrison and Bob Dylan this year.  Both go from a massive dump of material last year (although Harrison’s was of much higher quality than Dylan’s) to this year releasing a lone studio single (Harrison’s “Bangla Desh,” Dylan’s “George Jackson”) and their respective sets from the Concert for Bangladesh.  That concert itself is pretty good, but apart from Ravi Shankar’s Indian classical, nothing is especially a revelation live.  We also don’t get a lot of material from Neil Young.  In fact, we get no new studio material, and only his contribution to the CSNY live album actually released in ’71, although his 2007 Massey Hall solo acoustic concert shows that he definitely had more material in the works.  We actually do hear a fair amount of Neil Young in the studio though, as well as members of the Dead, and miscellaneous other LA/San Fran players on a mess of albums released as solo records, all backed by a rotating cast of folk-rockers.  Perhaps nowhere is this clearer than David Crosby’s album, which has some very identifiable Neil Young and Jerry Garcia lead guitar parts.  It’s also an album that rocks a lot harder than I remember it, since I normally associate Crosby as the hazy hippie-folk guy in CSN (i.e. the Crosby of “Guinevere”  and “Déjà vu”), and undoubtedly one of the best CSN solo records.  On the other hand, I don’t own any other Nash solo records, and I don’t really care for the Hollies, but I’ll be damned if Songs For Beginners isn’t my favorite CSN solo album (excluding Young).  It definitely doesn’t rock like Crosby’s, but it’s just so melodic and catchy, and just makes me feel happy.  Liz can testify that it’s my default Sunday morning record.
                It’s also, I admit, the kind of record that you can point to as where the West Coast folk-rock scene tipped into ‘70s soft rock.  Still, as mellow gold records go, they don’t get much mellower or more golden than Carole King’s Tapestry, which I won’t heap praise on the way I do Songs For Beginners, but doesn’t sound terribly removed from the LA folk-rock of CSN and the Byrds and the like and is a very well-constructed record.  This really shouldn’t be much of a surprise, since (in this way and no other) Carole King is like Isaac Hayes, one of those artists who wrote all sorts of pop hits for others before stepping out as a solo artist in the early ‘70s. 
The solo efforts from John and Paul also fit well in to the great mellowing of ’71.  For Paul, this isn’t too much of a surprise, as he’s basically just continuing the same pop experimentation he’s been doing since ’67 or so.  John’s more all over the map, having basically abandoned the stark, at times Stooges-like sound of Plastic Ono Band.  It’s too simplistic to say that John’s simply turned to a soft-rock sound, although tracks like “Jealous Guy” and “Oh Yoko!” sound appropriate next to Carole King and Graham Nash.  I feel I need to re-emphasize that saying it’s soft rock is by no means a slam, whatever I might have said in high school.  “Oh Yoko!,” for instance, is one of my all-time favorite John songs.  It’s more that, for me at least, hard rock can get by without being particularly clever if it’s got enough energy, so I can appreciate a lot of pretty generic-sounding hard rock.  I can only stomach soft rock if it’s especially catchy and clever, otherwise I get bored really quickly, and therefore loathe the generic-sounding version.  This, in turn, means that there’s a lot of hard rock I like well-enough, but that most soft-rock I actively despise, since the worst sin in music is being boring.  Anyway, Lennon is by no means just a soft-rocker this year, though, as he’s got tracks like “I Don’t Wanna Be A Soldier” and “It’s So Hard.”  He is kind of a jerk though, in that faux-apologetic “I know I’m a jerk, but I’m admitting it, which makes me a sensitive jerk, and therefore it’s ok for me to keep being a jerk” kinda way.  See “Jealous Guy” for a prime example of this.  Also, Ringo put out a fantastic single this year: the goofy “It Don’t Come Easy.” It would have sounded perfect as the lone Ringo track on a hypothetical ’71 Beatles album.
This soft-rock tone does kinda set the mood for a lot of stuff released in ’71.  Rod Stewart, for instance, splits his efforts between sounding like a b-list version of the Rolling Stones and mining a softer folk-rock sound himself.  Curiously, it’s not simply that Rod solo is soft-rock, and the Faces are hard-rock, but rather it’s all mixed together.  Of course, it’s a year when even the glam rock sounds of T. Rex sound pretty mellow for the most part, riding an easy boogying groove.  Marc Bolan’s still pretty much the only major glam artist at this point, though.  Mott The Hoople are still decidedly b-team, and Bowie sounds more like the Small Faces circa 1968 than anything else, with a very music-hall kind of sound.  He also sounds more like the Small Faces than the (regular-sized?) Faces themselves do at this point.  What he definitely has abandoned however, is the progressive sound he toyed with on The Man Who Sold the World, although having Rick Wakeman play keys on Hunky Dory doesn’t hurt in prog-cred terms. 
Speaking of bands that used to work in the music-hall style, the Kinks have deepened substantially the rootsy vein they opened last year.  Muswell Hillbillies is definitely their “American roots-rock” album, even if they stamp their decidedly unique vision on it (and offer, in the title track, the first of Ray Davies’ many songs about gentrification).  In the sense that it’s Brits mining American roots sounds, it’s not so far removed from what the Faces and the Stones are doing, although the Kinks certainly have their own take on it.  What the Kinks do share with the Stones, though, is that neither of them is part of the soft-rock trend that the Faces dabble in and overtakes a lot of the Americans.  In fact, Sticky Fingers might be the most-rockin’ of all the Stones albums.  It also is far too limiting to say that it’s a roots-rock album.  Much like Let It Bleed, on Sticky Fingers the Stones are drawing from a lot of sources.  Rock & roll & blues, obviously, but also country on the excellent “Dead Flowers” and “Wild Horses” (stolen back from the Flying Burrito Brothers, whose first post-Parsons album is released this year but I don’t own it).  Also there’s the Southern rock-Santana fusion of “Can’t You Hear Me Knockin’,” and a song that I’d overlooked before, “I’ve Got the Blues.”  It really sounds like the Stones have been listening to a lot of what came out of Memphis recently, both insofar as it sounds like something Isaac Hayes could have written and absolutely like something Elvis in his Memphis period could have released.  Elvis himself, incidentally, comes to the end of his run of great albums, with Elvis Country, which shows that Elvis too has been listening to a lot of what’s going on around him, especially what’s happening in the world of outlaw country (and heck, he covers Willie Nelson).  It’s still all very produced, but it shows how much Elvis emerged in a period when the difference between country and the blues was basically nonexistent musically that he sounds as comfortable singing Stax-style soul as he does singing circa 1971 country.  Also, “I Washed My Hands In Muddy Water” is worth noting for the way in which it fuses Stax-style horns with a country/southern rock style melody.  Really, it sounds like something the Stones would do.
It is interesting to compare the Stones to Led Zeppelin this year.  Not only do both release what is possibly their career-best album, but both albums showcase how much they’ve been listening to what’s been going on around them.  HunHunHFor the Stones, this means country and soul, but for Zep, it’s a heap of Fairport-style English folk-rock, esp. on “Going to California” and “Battle of Evermore,” itself featuring ex-Fairport vocalist Sandy Denny, the rare guest musician on a Zeppelin studio recording.  It also means prog-rock, on the very King Crimson sounding (at least in the beginning) “Stairway to Heaven.”  And, of course, there’s a bunch of rock & roll and blues, and here’s where it’s interesting to directly compare the Stones and Zeppelin, and especially (for instance) their respective rock & roll attempts (for instance “Rock & Roll” and “Bitch”).  What it really shows is that the Stones know how to give their music hips, while Zeppelin swings like Englishmen who like gentle folk music and prog rock.  It does mean that “Rock & Roll” is the first of many Zeppelin genre experiments where it took me years of listening to figure out that they were trying to do a genre experiment, as opposed to just making another Zep rocker.  On the other hand, it also means that Zeppelin can do a song with the big pounding sound of “When the Levee Breaks,” which I don’t think the Stones could ever match.  Of course, circa 1971, probably the only other band that really could is Sabbath, who also put out a career record themselves.  Unlike the Stones and Zep, though, there’s not a lot of genre diversity going on on Master of Reality, which is practically a concept album about Tony Iommi’s newfound guitar tone (and Jesus).
Another band which seems worth comparing to Zeppelin is Jethro Tull, who also started out as a blues band, before getting fascinated by prog and folk.  Aqualung doesn’t sound much like Zep, of course, although it’s working with a lot of the same prog/folk/rock elements.  Tull sound like they have a lot more to say lyrically than Zeppelin, of course.  (As an aside, between Ian Anderson’s concept album about religion, Sabbath’s gonzo-Christian-rock, and Lennon’s “God” and “Imagine”, 1970-71 was apparently a peak period for songs about religion.)  Anyway, Tull sound more like Zep than anything else happening in the world of prog, which is starting to drift far more into long-form song construction than Tull are at this point.  Still, it’s a very good year for prog, where both Yes and Pink Floyd produce their first albums in their classic sounds.  Their respective albums from last year offered big hints that they were almost there, but it’s still impressive how much more confident each sound this year, being much more willing to risk long-form experiments that actually work.  (also, Yes’s Fragile came out in ’71 in the UK, but ’72 in the US: itunes dated it as ’72, which I didn’t’ realize until just before this went up, so while normally I’d talk about it here, I’ll instead throw in under ’72).  Crimson also release an album this year, but while I listened to it only yesterday, and don’t remember disliking what I heard, I remember virtually nothing about it.  There’s a reason a 3 year gap in my Crimson discography begins now, I guess. 
The biggest genre innovation this year, or at least the one I get most excited about, however, is neither prog’s breakthrough nor soft-rock’s: it’s the emergence of funk as a distinct genre.  Obviously there were things earlier that you could point to as funk or proto-funk, especially by James Brown or Sly & The Family Stone, but heard in context they really just sounded like part of soul, and not a distinct genre.  That is no longer the case by ’71.  Not only is James Brown getting deeper and longer in his grooves, but the biggest developments are probably Funkadelic’s Maggot Brain and Sly & the Family Stone’s There’s A Riot Going On.  The first builds on Funkadelic’s psychedelic stuff from last year, but grounds it in a more solid groove, creating the spaced-out but danceable template for much of what came after.  As for Sly & the Family, they’re worlds away from the optimistic rock-soul of “You Can Make It IF You Try,” and while there’s been a lot of ink spilled on the lyrical turn, what’s more interesting to me is how they’re much more narrowly focused on a tight hard funk groove.  Also, it’s probably worth noting that Isaac Hayes too shifts to funk, with Shaft, as does Miles Davis on my favorite of his fusion-period records, A Tribute to Jack Johnson.  Santana also has moved more into a funk sound, although it’s not so radically different from what they did before.  Sadly, I apparently left my copy of their next album up at my mom’s, so I won’t be able to talk about their turn to fusion in much detail.
Of course, soul is still going in its own way, where the biggest development is probably Marvin Gaye’s What’s Going On, the first major statement of Gaye as more than just a part of the Motown stable of artists, with his own unique (though soon imitated) sound.  It’s really pretty comparable to Van Morrison’s shift from the more formula (but still excellent) blues-rock of Them to the atmospheric but tightly constructed sound of Astral Weeks.  What’s Going On  is lyrically much more focused on real-world concerns than the flights of fancy of Van’s album, but they’re similar insofar as both are in fact song-based, but songs of such spontaneous-sounding yet deliberate construction that you can’t really hear (or want to hear) anyone else try to perform them.  Outside of Marvin, a lot of what’s going on in soul is less revolutionary and more evolutionary.  Al Green is here, but sounds like a natural continuation of the Memphis/Stax sound.  Stevie Wonder continues his relatively slow evolution (though since he’s still only 20, I’ll cut him some slack).  The rest of Motown shows how little that sound evolved.  The things that, for instance, Michael Jackson is doing in 1971 sound pretty close to what Diana Ross was doing in 1965.  Great songs, but not revolutionary.  I should pause to give a shout-out to the Temptations, who are deep in their psychedelic soul sound.  Like Marvin, they’re lost in their own world, but unlike Marvin, their sound produces a lot fewer imitators, sadly.
A couple of outliers from the LA rock scene deserve some note.  While the rest of LA moves toward a soft rock-folk rock sound, the Doors and the Beach Boys are off in their own musical universes.  The Beach Boys haven’t become a hard rock band or anything, but their sound is a lot less folk-derived and a lot more bleak than what, for instance, the CSN conglomerate are up to.  For my money, Surf’s Up is the Beach Boy’s finest post-Pet Sounds album, even if it’s got some really dumb songs by the non-Wilson members, and even if its best track (“Surf’s Up”) is a SMiLE remnant.  It also has Carl’s excellent attempt at Brian’s sound (“Feel Flows”) and Brian’s “Till I Die,” which is both magnificent and magnificently sad in its ability to capture his despair.  The Doors, meanwhile, put out what I think is their best album by mixing the blues-rock sound of Morrison Hotel with the dark poetry approach of their first couple.  The result is more distinctive than the sometimes-generic Morrison Hotel, but also easier to take seriously than the sometimes over-the-top sound of The Doors and Strange Days.  Maybe because it’s hard to pull off an L.A. Woman without a vocalist of Jim Morisson’s caliber, but while the Doors were tremendously influential (mostly on the goths), it wasn’t for this sound.  Although it doesn’t sound too much different from what John Lee Hooker’s up to this year, which to my continued amazement sounds exactly like what he’s been putting out since 1948.  I guess you don’t mess with a sound that good…
Song of the Year:  “Whipping Post”- The Allman Brothers.  In the run-up to 1971, this was the song I was most excited to listen to, and it did not disappoint.
Album of the Year:  I suppose it has to be either Sticky Fingers or Led Zeppelin IV, although there’s a part of me that wants to toss it to Songs For Beginners.  Ultimately, though, I give the nod to Zeppelin.  The Stones are very very good, but I still like Let It Bleed better.  Zeppelin, however, have outdone their previous efforts with this one.
Artist Most Benefiting from Reevaluation:  Elvis Presley.  I always kind of assumed that Elvis in Memphis was the end of worthwhile Elvis, but I was wrong.  Elvis Country sounds as good as any Elvis album, and is good enough to make me think I need to pick up more of Elvis’s ‘70s stuff.  We’ll see if his less-than-stellar ’72 album disabuses me of that notion, though…
Artist Most Diminished in Reevaluation:  Traffic, I think.  Their live album is just ok.  Their studio album (The Low Spark of High Heel Boys) does pursue a somewhat interesting prog-jazz-rock direction, but it’s also a step down from last year, and apart from the title track, not all that compelling.
Album List
Al Green - The Absolute Best
Black Sabbath - Master of Reality
Black Sabbath - Past Lives
Bob Dylan - George Jackson
Bob Dylan - Vol. 2 : Rare And Unreleased, 1963-1974
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Soul Rebels
Bob Marley & The Wailers - Trenchtown Rock: The Anthology 1969-78
Can - Tago Mago
Charles Wright & The Watts 103rd Street Rhythm Band - Express Yourself: The Best Of Charles Wright
Crosby, Stills & Nash (& Young) - Carry On
David Bowie - Changesbowie
David Bowie - Hunky Dory
David Crosby – If Only I Could Remember My Name
Deep Purple - The Very Best Of Deep Purple
Dennis Alcapone - Guns Don't Argue
Electric Light Orchestra - Strange Magic: The Best Of Electric Light Orchestra
Elton John - Greatest Hits 1970-2002
Elvis Presley - Elvis Country
Elvis Presley - From Elvis in Memphis
Elvis Presley - The Memphis Record
Funkadelic - Maggot Brain
George Harrison - The Best Of George Harrison
George Harrison – The Concert for Bangladesh
Graham Nash – Songs for Beginners
Isaac Hayes - Greatest Hits Singles
James Brown - 20 All Time Greatest Hits!
James Brown - Make It Funky: 1971-75
James Brown - The Big Payback: 1971-1975
Jethro Tull – Aqualung
Jethro Tull - Original Masters
John Lee Hooker - The Ultimate Collection 1948-1990
John Lennon - Imagine
John Lennon - Imagine Soundtrack
Joni Mitchell – Blue
Joni Mitchell - Hits
King Crimson – Islands
Led Zeppelin - BBC Sessions
Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin IV
Led Zeppelin - Wedding Songs
Mahavishnu Orchestra - Inner Mounting Flame
Marvin Gaye - What's Going On
Merle Haggard - HAG: The Best Of Merle Haggard
Michael Jackson - The Essential Michael Jackson
Miles Davis - A Tribute To Jack Johnson
Mott The Hoople - An Introduction To Mott The Hoople
Mott The Hoople – Rock n Roll Queen
Mountain – Flowers of Evil
Neil Young - Live At Massey Hall 1971
Os Mutantes - Everything Is Possible!: The Best Of Os Mutantes
Osibisa – Woyaya
Ozzy Osbourne - The Ozzman Cometh
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: History
Paul McCartney - Wingspan: Hits
Pink Floyd - Meddle
Ringo Starr - Photograph: The Very Best Of Ringo Starr
Rod Stewart & The Faces - Gold
Rod Stewart & The Faces - The Best Of Faces: Good Boys When They're Asleep
Santana – Santana (III)
Shirley Collins & The Albion Country Band - No Roses
Sly & The Family Stone - The Essential Sly & The Family Stone
Stevie Wonder - At The Close Of A Century
T. Rex - 20th Century Boy: The Ultimate Collection
T. Rex – Electric Warrior
The Allman Brothers – Live At the Fillmore
The Beach Boys - Good Vibrations: Thirty Years Of The Beach Boys
The Beach Boys – Surf’s Up
The Byrds - VI: Final Approach
The Doors – L.A. Woman
The Ethiopians - Everything Crash: The Best of The Ethiopians
The Grateful Dead – The Grateful Dead
The Kinks - Celluloid Heroes
The Kinks – Muswell Hillbillies
The Kinks - Percy
The Kinks - The Kink Kronikles
The Rolling Stones - Forty Licks
The Rolling Stones - Singles Collection: The London Years
The Rolling Stones - Sticky Fingers
The Staple Singers - The Staple Swingers
The Staple Singers - The Very Best Of The Staple Singers
The Temptations - Psychedelic Soul
The Who - Pete Townshend - Lifehouse Elements
The Who - The Ultimate Collection
Traffic – The Low Spark of High Heel Boys
Traffic - Welcome To The Canteen
V/A - Beleza Tropical: Brazil Classics 1
V/A - Hitsville U.S.A.
V/A - Kill Bill, Vol. 1
V/A - Pure Funk
V/A - Reservoir Dogs
V/A - Rushmore
V/A - Samba Soul 70!
Yes - The Yes Album